From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC3.0 [Was; Webbrowser]
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:30:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302060825560.5323-100000@csl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <981e9fab3325f419f267dbb5e9f4937d@plan9.bell-labs.com>
this is iostats:
read 238369 bytes, 13.02132 Kb/sec
write 1266 bytes, .4715208 Kb/sec
protocol 659280 bytes, 28.10126 Kb/sec
rpc 8876 count
Message Count Low High Time Averg in out
version 1 0 0 0 0 ms 19 19 bytes
attach 1 0 0 0 0 ms 25 20 bytes
flush 1 10000000 0 0 0 ms 9 7 bytes
walk 2544 0 153 551 0 ms 78729 88992 bytes
open 1248 0 117 785 0 ms 14976 29928 bytes
read 1277 0 11179 17877 13 ms 29371 252416 bytes
write 15 0 686 2622 174 ms 1611 165 bytes
clunk 2542 0 44 379 0 ms 27962 17794 bytes
stat 1247 0 50 697 0 ms 13717 103426 bytes
Opens Reads (bytes) Writes (bytes) File
1233 1233 88776 0 0 /dev/cputime
1 0 0 1 5 /proc/10281/note
1 0 0 1 5 /proc/10282/note
1 0 0 1 5 /proc/10287/note
2 0 0 2 9 /proc/10289/note
1 0 0 1 5 /proc/10295/note
1 1 172 0 0 /adm/users
1 2 7 0 0 (stdin)
1 0 0 7 1227 (stdout)
1 0 0 2 10 (stderr)
1 2 579 0 0 /rc/lib/rcmain
1 24 91459 0 0 /bin/rc
1 15 57376 0 0 /usr/bootes/ubench-0.32/ubench
and this is what kprof has to say:
total: 492060 in kernel text: 56450 outside kernel text: 435610
KTZERO 80100000
ms % sym
50180 88.8 halt
3210 5.6 memmove
420 0.7 savagewaitidle
410 0.7 i8259isr
350 0.6 inb
250 0.4 drawclip
150 0.2 runproc
130 0.2 wbflush
120 0.2 memset
110 0.1 chardraw
70 0.1 rectclip
60 0.1 memdraw
50 0.0 drawmesg
50 0.0 convD2M
50 0.0 strlen
40 0.0 syscall
30 0.0 drawgoodname
30 0.0 _syscallintr
30 0.0 dstflush
30 0.0 memimagedraw
30 0.0 drawreplxy
interesting tidbit -- iostats filled up the memory on both machines I tried
it on (128 and 512 MB), it's fun to look at in 'stats'
adnrey
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David Presotto wrote:
> I looked at at the benchmarks. There are lots of times() calls in
> inner loops that are very low cost in Unix but pretty expensive in
> Plan 9. Why not do a run under iostats and post the results. It
> might be enlightening.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-06 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-05 20:44 [9fans] Webbrowser Keith Nash
2003-02-05 22:27 ` John Packer
2003-02-05 22:55 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-02-06 0:53 ` John Packer
2003-02-06 1:19 ` Russ Cox
2003-02-06 3:00 ` [9fans] GCC3.0 [Was; Webbrowser] andrey mirtchovski
2003-02-06 4:16 ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-02-06 14:24 ` David Presotto
2003-02-06 15:30 ` andrey mirtchovski [this message]
2003-02-06 17:32 ` David Presotto
2003-02-06 18:10 ` William K. Josephson
2003-02-06 18:16 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 18:23 ` William K. Josephson
2003-02-06 21:09 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 12:30 ` [9fans] Webbrowser - porting mozilla matt
2003-02-06 12:52 ` Ian Broster
2003-02-06 2:13 ` [9fans] Webbrowser Peter Bosch
2003-02-06 5:28 [9fans] GCC3.0 [Was; Webbrowser] okamoto
2003-02-06 5:40 ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-02-06 15:15 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 15:39 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2003-02-06 15:45 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 16:31 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-02-06 16:36 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-02-06 16:56 ` matt
2003-02-06 17:11 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 17:25 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2003-02-06 17:32 ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-02-06 17:44 ` Sam
2003-02-06 18:07 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 18:14 ` David Presotto
2003-02-06 18:17 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 20:36 ` Dean Prichard
2003-02-06 18:35 ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-02-06 18:43 ` David Presotto
2003-02-06 19:12 ` David Presotto
2003-02-06 19:20 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-02-06 17:23 ` David Butler
2003-02-06 17:50 C H Forsyth
2003-02-06 18:08 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-02-06 20:13 Keith Nash
2003-02-06 21:29 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2003-02-06 21:33 ` Russ Cox
2003-02-06 21:40 ` Jack Johnson
2003-02-07 8:44 ` Richard Miller
2003-02-07 13:51 ` matt
2003-02-07 14:03 ` Boyd Roberts
2003-02-07 0:06 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-02-07 5:32 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-02-07 1:46 okamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0302060825560.5323-100000@csl \
--to=mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).