Positrons (was Re: [9fans] g++)

Positrons (was Re: [9fans] g++)

[Joel Salomon]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:54:43AM -0500, splite@purdue.edu wrote:

> You'd still need to slap it with a phased verteron pulse, which would
> depolarize the resonance frequency generators and generate a subspace
> field implosion, inducing a reload of the positronic subprocessors from
> the protected memory archive.  Duh.

A phased verteron pulse! Of course, I should have tried it. I tried the
exact same procedure but I used a verteron stream!  I now realize that
althought the verteron stream is defined by a function that is everywhere
discontinuous (so it should just have been very fast pulse) I errred on
that one..


--Joel

Positrons (was Re: [9fans] g++)

[Derek Fawcus]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:54:43AM -0500, splite@purdue.edu wrote:
> You'd still need to slap it with a phased verteron pulse, which would
> depolarize the resonance frequency generators and generate a subspace
> field implosion, inducing a reload of the positronic subprocessors from
> the protected memory archive.  Duh.

One thing I always found amusing about the use of 'positronics' vs electronics
in SF was what heppens if the back up battery is turned off?

*poof* Daneel's head vanished in a flash of blinding light and gamma rays.

DF