* [9fans] GSOC proposal
@ 2009-03-28 2:19 Bruce Ellis
2010-03-25 11:03 ` yy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ellis @ 2009-03-28 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Just a suggestion,
A good forth system using acme, probably based on fgb's 4th. The goal
is to conquer the Seaforth chip.
I know the dev kit is US$500 but their compiler and simulator, written
in forth, doesn't need hardware.
And at least two 9fans have a kit.
brucee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] GSOC proposal
2009-03-28 2:19 [9fans] GSOC proposal Bruce Ellis
@ 2010-03-25 11:03 ` yy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: yy @ 2010-03-25 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs; +Cc: plan9-gsoc
2009/3/28 Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>:
> Just a suggestion,
>
> A good forth system using acme, probably based on fgb's 4th. The goal
> is to conquer the Seaforth chip.
>
> I know the dev kit is US$500 but their compiler and simulator, written
> in forth, doesn't need hardware.
>
> And at least two 9fans have a kit.
>
> brucee
>
>
Would such a project be interesting for this year gsoc? Is any mentor
interested in Forth?
I really think acme would make a great environment for Forth
development. I have not used 4th except to play a bit with it, but I
have spent the last months porting the Ngaro VM to Go [1], which is
used to run retroForth [2] images, and I think that could be a good
starting point too.
[1] http://hg.4l77.com/gonga/
[2] http://retroforth.org
PS: I'm CCing this to the GSoC list, but since the original message
appeared here I'm replying to 9fans too.
--
- yiyus || JGL . 4l77.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Plan 9 Google Summer of Code" group.
To post to this group, send email to plan9-gsoc@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to plan9-gsoc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/plan9-gsoc?hl=en.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] GSOC proposal
@ 2010-04-18 0:51 Jeff Sickel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Sickel @ 2010-04-18 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1191 bytes --]
This is really too late for the GSoC bits. But possibly of interests for later developments...
On Mar 25, 2010, at 6:03 AM, yy wrote:
>
> Would such a project be interesting for this year gsoc? Is any mentor
> interested in Forth?
>
> I really think acme would make a great environment for Forth
> development. I have not used 4th except to play a bit with it, but I
> have spent the last months porting the Ngaro VM to Go [1], which is
> used to run retroForth [2] images, and I think that could be a good
> starting point too.
>
> [1] http://hg.4l77.com/gonga/
> [2] http://retroforth.org
>
> PS: I'm CCing this to the GSoC list, but since the original message
> appeared here I'm replying to 9fans too.
A viable environment using in Plan 9 or Inferno to develop code for arrayForth and the GA line of chips that use it would be nice. Well, nice for a few of us who may have future board designs using those chips.
Getting some Forth-SIM environment for any Plan 9 $objtype would help from having to run Windows IDEs on native x86 hardware or in VMs. Additionally, flashing the GA chips from Plan 9 sure would make development decisions easier.
-jas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1635 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-18 0:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-28 2:19 [9fans] GSOC proposal Bruce Ellis
2010-03-25 11:03 ` yy
2010-04-18 0:51 Jeff Sickel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).