[9fans] [Fwd: IWP9 2008]

[9fans] [Fwd: IWP9 2008]

[don bailey]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 327 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Doesn't look like this got through via 9fans@9fans.net, so here we go
again...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH1XssyWX0NBMJYAcRAjRLAJ9HZXT/YQLZnKUIZniKaFQC2SDTlACguVYn
pmzPLjq4S+pa1G+4lTszRo8=
=O5As
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: IWP9 2008.eml --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 671 bytes --]

From: don bailey <don.bailey@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: IWP9 2008
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:05:31 -0600
Message-ID: <47D4A57B.2080307@gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is there a website for this year's IWP9 with the usual info?

D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH1KV1yWX0NBMJYAcRArLxAJwKwjMbJie3xsTJEhwM5ZQdTAfX0ACfZYZE
oZ8vnVRTiad/AWUqubdv6Nw=
=HS0W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [9fans] [Fwd: IWP9 2008]

[john]

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Doesn't look like this got through via 9fans@9fans.net, so here we go
> again...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFH1XssyWX0NBMJYAcRAjRLAJ9HZXT/YQLZnKUIZniKaFQC2SDTlACguVYn
> pmzPLjq4S+pa1G+4lTszRo8=
> =O5As
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

It came through just fine in both cases.
And no, to the best of my knowledge, there isn't one yet.
The lack of people saying "nope, don't think so" doesn't mean
that your email didn't get through... check the archives next
time: http://9fans.net/archive/2008/03

John

Re: [9fans] [Fwd: IWP9 2008]

[don bailey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

john@csplan9.rit.edu wrote:
> Doesn't look like this got through via 9fans@9fans.net, so here we go
> again...

> It came through just fine in both cases.
> And no, to the best of my knowledge, there isn't one yet.
> The lack of people saying "nope, don't think so" doesn't mean
> that your email didn't get through... check the archives next
> time: http://9fans.net/archive/2008/03

I did check the archives or I wouldn't have resent it.

D


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH1ax0yWX0NBMJYAcRAmSCAKC0RauO4H58msXPDlW9gM00zUzZTQCeJNZf
PWblZCd3eLpXG1b0cQGSO44=
=hK0f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [9fans] [Fwd: IWP9 2008]

[john]

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> john@csplan9.rit.edu wrote:
>> Doesn't look like this got through via 9fans@9fans.net, so here we go
>> again...
>
>> It came through just fine in both cases.
>> And no, to the best of my knowledge, there isn't one yet.
>> The lack of people saying "nope, don't think so" doesn't mean
>> that your email didn't get through... check the archives next
>> time: http://9fans.net/archive/2008/03
>
> I did check the archives or I wouldn't have resent it.
>
> D
>
>

http://9fans.net/archive/2008/03/221

But bits are cheap, so no worries.

John