* [9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production.
@ 2007-05-11 10:25 Vester Thacker
2007-05-11 17:42 ` lucio
2007-05-11 18:17 ` Christopher Nielsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vester Thacker @ 2007-05-11 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Would it be beneficial to have public accessible revision control
servers for Plan 9 development and UAT?
I`m interested in the developers` thoughts about access, revision
control, and moving forward as a community. Are people having a
problem with the present model? If so, then what are your suggestions
for improvements?
Uriel, this isn`t intended as an opportunity for you or anyone else to
rant. I want to know what everyone else thinks for a change. :)
If all is well, I`d like to know that too.
Regards,
Vester
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production.
2007-05-11 10:25 [9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production Vester Thacker
@ 2007-05-11 17:42 ` lucio
2007-05-11 18:17 ` Christopher Nielsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: lucio @ 2007-05-11 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> I`m interested in the developers` thoughts about access, revision
> control, and moving forward as a community. Are people having a
> problem with the present model? If so, then what are your suggestions
> for improvements?
In the debate between the "cathedral" and the "bazaar" models, where
do you think Plan 9 belongs? Would you really have it otherwise?
++L
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production.
2007-05-11 10:25 [9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production Vester Thacker
2007-05-11 17:42 ` lucio
@ 2007-05-11 18:17 ` Christopher Nielsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Nielsen @ 2007-05-11 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
i find it fine the way it is, but i haven't been submitting any
patches recently.
On 5/11/07, Vester Thacker <vester.thacker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be beneficial to have public accessible revision control
> servers for Plan 9 development and UAT?
>
> I`m interested in the developers` thoughts about access, revision
> control, and moving forward as a community. Are people having a
> problem with the present model? If so, then what are your suggestions
> for improvements?
>
> Uriel, this isn`t intended as an opportunity for you or anyone else to
> rant. I want to know what everyone else thinks for a change. :)
>
> If all is well, I`d like to know that too.
>
> Regards,
> Vester
>
--
Christopher Nielsen
"They who can give up essential liberty for temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-11 18:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-11 10:25 [9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production Vester Thacker
2007-05-11 17:42 ` lucio
2007-05-11 18:17 ` Christopher Nielsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).