9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] slightly OT: tcs or iconv
@ 2007-05-23 16:13 Robert Raschke
  2007-05-23 16:59 ` Russ Cox
  2007-05-23 19:02 ` [9fans] " Darren Bane
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Raschke @ 2007-05-23 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Hi,

I am currently investigating how best to cope with multiple character
sets.  This is on Windows, but I am loathe to get into the what look
like exceedingly murky waters of MS character set handling.

Since I use Plan 9 at home, I am familiar with the wonderful
simplicity of tcs, so I am wondering, has anybody got some thoughts on
the benefits of tcs over iconv?  I feel inclined to go with tcs
because I can understand what it is doing by reading the code (and I
feel confident that I can get it built on Windows).  With iconv this
is a lot harder (my brain is not big enough for all the gnuisms) and I
would stick to using it as a black box.

Thanks for any opinions,
Robby

--
r dot raschke at tombob dot com




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] slightly OT: tcs or iconv
  2007-05-23 16:13 [9fans] slightly OT: tcs or iconv Robert Raschke
@ 2007-05-23 16:59 ` Russ Cox
  2007-05-23 17:58   ` Robert Raschke
  2007-05-23 19:02 ` [9fans] " Darren Bane
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2007-05-23 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> Since I use Plan 9 at home, I am familiar with the wonderful
> simplicity of tcs, so I am wondering, has anybody got some thoughts on
> the benefits of tcs over iconv?  I feel inclined to go with tcs
> because I can understand what it is doing by reading the code (and I
> feel confident that I can get it built on Windows).  With iconv this
> is a lot harder (my brain is not big enough for all the gnuisms) and I
> would stick to using it as a black box.

if tcs works for you and iconv scares you, the choice is simple.

russ



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] slightly OT: tcs or iconv
  2007-05-23 16:59 ` Russ Cox
@ 2007-05-23 17:58   ` Robert Raschke
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Raschke @ 2007-05-23 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Russ wrote:
> if tcs works for you and iconv scares you, the choice is simple.

:-)

Yeah, I guess it sometimes just takes an outside voice to clear the
head.

Getting bombarded by requests to stick to "standards" (XML, anyone?)
day in, day out sure helps to cloud ones judgement.

Thanks for the brevity,
Robby

--
r dot raschke at tombob dot com




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [9fans] Re: slightly OT: tcs or iconv
  2007-05-23 16:13 [9fans] slightly OT: tcs or iconv Robert Raschke
  2007-05-23 16:59 ` Russ Cox
@ 2007-05-23 19:02 ` Darren Bane
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Darren Bane @ 2007-05-23 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Robert Raschke <rrplan9@tombob.com> wrote:

!snip!

> I feel inclined to go with tcs
> because I can understand what it is doing by reading the code (and I
> feel confident that I can get it built on Windows).

If you run into trouble here, don't forget that tcs comes as part of
Inferno too, which already runs on Windows.

And to echo a later message of yours, "standards" and "best
practices" are at the root of some of the worst designs I've seen.

!snip!
-- 
Darren Bane



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-23 19:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-23 16:13 [9fans] slightly OT: tcs or iconv Robert Raschke
2007-05-23 16:59 ` Russ Cox
2007-05-23 17:58   ` Robert Raschke
2007-05-23 19:02 ` [9fans] " Darren Bane

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).