* Is style(6) still relevant?
@ 2015-03-17 10:10 Giacomo Tesio
2015-03-17 13:57 ` [9front] " Kurt H Maier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Giacomo Tesio @ 2015-03-17 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 145 bytes --]
From style(6)
> Plan 9 C code has its own conventions. You would do well to follow them.
Is such statement still true, in 9front?
Giacomo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 424 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] Is style(6) still relevant?
2015-03-17 10:10 Is style(6) still relevant? Giacomo Tesio
@ 2015-03-17 13:57 ` Kurt H Maier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kurt H Maier @ 2015-03-17 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
Quoting Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>:
> From style(6)
>
>
>> Plan 9 C code has its own conventions. You would do well to follow them.
>
>
> Is such statement still true, in 9front?
>
>
> Giacomo
Yes.
khm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-17 13:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-17 10:10 Is style(6) still relevant? Giacomo Tesio
2015-03-17 13:57 ` [9front] " Kurt H Maier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).