9front - general discussion about 9front
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mischief@9.offblast.org
To: 9front@9front.org,Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>
Subject: Re: [9front] 9front on Xen 4.4 HVM
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:50:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71CF92B8-D188-4871-94CD-5FA73DFF38FA@9.offblast.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHL7psF3LB74nnU6BJ1Js2duQHc42nQcna9URCQpaMA487PndA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3030 bytes --]

I am the one who imported the xen kernel from labs and I ran 9front on xen a few months ago. It supports one cpu and iirc 512mb ram. I can recover my xen configs and post them shortly.

On February 21, 2015 10:46:12 AM PST, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
>Thanks for your help cinap.  It's an interesting dive into the kernel
>internals.
>
>Btw, I've tried various combinations of networks drivers (virtio-net
>or rtl) and plan9.ini options but with no success.
>
>Now I'm planning to write a plan9.ini menu with the following
>configurations trying one after another looking for a working
>solution.
>
>As far as I have undestood, I should test
>1) *npmp=
>2) *nomsi=
>3) *acpi=
>and the 4 combinations of them, right?
>
>Is there anything else that I can do to identify and fix the issue?
>
>I assigned to the 9front guest only one cpu, to reduce the variables,
>but actually, if to run on xen 9front must use a single cpu, then the
>disadvantage of the pv guest will be lower, and I could give it a try
>too.
>
>Strangely, looks like I'm the first to try installing plan9 on xen in
>the last few years...
>
>
>Giacomo
>
>2015-02-21 12:51 GMT+01:00  <cinap_lenrek@felloff.net>:
>> well, that sounds like a interrupt problem indeed. when you send
>> packets, all the driver does is to put packets in transmit ring
>> and optionally kick the card with some register that it should start
>> transmitting.
>>
>> but receiving works by the card issuing a interrupt and then the
>> driver looks in the receive ring if there are new packets from the
>> card.
>>
>> if interrupt couldnt be enabled (because if broken mp tables), then
>> we wont receive anything. but sending might still work because it
>> doesnt need an interrupt.
>>
>> the relation with mp is that mp systems use the apic interrupt
>> controller instead of the legacy pic controller (it is mandatory
>> as you need to use the apic to bootstrap the other processors).
>>
>> enabling interrupt on pic is easy. you read the irq register
>> from the pci config space (that the bios programmed for you)...
>> sometimes, pci interrupt router needs to be programmed.
>>
>> apic is a bit more complicated than pic because there can be multiple
>> apic controllers (and multiple processors/lapic's) and we require
>> tables (from bios) to find the mapping from pci bus interrupt
>> lines to the apics (which can then be programmed to send interrupts
>> to the lapics/processors).
>>
>> and then theres msi interrupts that *some* devices support that
>> do not require any tables. you program register in pci config
>> space for the device and you'r done. this also works only with
>> apic.
>>
>> when you specify *acpi= in plan9.ini, then the kernel will use
>> the acpi tables instead of the mp tables.
>>
>> when you use *nomp=, then we will use legacy pic interrupt controller
>> and only one cpu can be used (this is also what happens when we
>cannot
>> find mp table).
>>
>> --
>> cinap

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3586 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-21 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-20 16:54 Giacomo Tesio
2015-02-20 17:09 ` [9front] " cinap_lenrek
2015-02-21 10:50   ` Giacomo Tesio
2015-02-21 11:51     ` cinap_lenrek
2015-02-21 18:46       ` Giacomo Tesio
2015-02-21 19:50         ` mischief [this message]
2015-02-21 20:46         ` cinap_lenrek
2015-02-21 21:57           ` Giacomo Tesio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71CF92B8-D188-4871-94CD-5FA73DFF38FA@9.offblast.org \
    --to=mischief@9.offblast.org \
    --cc=9front@9front.org \
    --cc=giacomo@tesio.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).