From: mischief@9.offblast.org
To: 9front@9front.org,Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>
Subject: Re: [9front] 9front on Xen 4.4 HVM
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:50:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71CF92B8-D188-4871-94CD-5FA73DFF38FA@9.offblast.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHL7psF3LB74nnU6BJ1Js2duQHc42nQcna9URCQpaMA487PndA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3030 bytes --]
I am the one who imported the xen kernel from labs and I ran 9front on xen a few months ago. It supports one cpu and iirc 512mb ram. I can recover my xen configs and post them shortly.
On February 21, 2015 10:46:12 AM PST, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
>Thanks for your help cinap. It's an interesting dive into the kernel
>internals.
>
>Btw, I've tried various combinations of networks drivers (virtio-net
>or rtl) and plan9.ini options but with no success.
>
>Now I'm planning to write a plan9.ini menu with the following
>configurations trying one after another looking for a working
>solution.
>
>As far as I have undestood, I should test
>1) *npmp=
>2) *nomsi=
>3) *acpi=
>and the 4 combinations of them, right?
>
>Is there anything else that I can do to identify and fix the issue?
>
>I assigned to the 9front guest only one cpu, to reduce the variables,
>but actually, if to run on xen 9front must use a single cpu, then the
>disadvantage of the pv guest will be lower, and I could give it a try
>too.
>
>Strangely, looks like I'm the first to try installing plan9 on xen in
>the last few years...
>
>
>Giacomo
>
>2015-02-21 12:51 GMT+01:00 <cinap_lenrek@felloff.net>:
>> well, that sounds like a interrupt problem indeed. when you send
>> packets, all the driver does is to put packets in transmit ring
>> and optionally kick the card with some register that it should start
>> transmitting.
>>
>> but receiving works by the card issuing a interrupt and then the
>> driver looks in the receive ring if there are new packets from the
>> card.
>>
>> if interrupt couldnt be enabled (because if broken mp tables), then
>> we wont receive anything. but sending might still work because it
>> doesnt need an interrupt.
>>
>> the relation with mp is that mp systems use the apic interrupt
>> controller instead of the legacy pic controller (it is mandatory
>> as you need to use the apic to bootstrap the other processors).
>>
>> enabling interrupt on pic is easy. you read the irq register
>> from the pci config space (that the bios programmed for you)...
>> sometimes, pci interrupt router needs to be programmed.
>>
>> apic is a bit more complicated than pic because there can be multiple
>> apic controllers (and multiple processors/lapic's) and we require
>> tables (from bios) to find the mapping from pci bus interrupt
>> lines to the apics (which can then be programmed to send interrupts
>> to the lapics/processors).
>>
>> and then theres msi interrupts that *some* devices support that
>> do not require any tables. you program register in pci config
>> space for the device and you'r done. this also works only with
>> apic.
>>
>> when you specify *acpi= in plan9.ini, then the kernel will use
>> the acpi tables instead of the mp tables.
>>
>> when you use *nomp=, then we will use legacy pic interrupt controller
>> and only one cpu can be used (this is also what happens when we
>cannot
>> find mp table).
>>
>> --
>> cinap
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3586 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-21 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 16:54 Giacomo Tesio
2015-02-20 17:09 ` [9front] " cinap_lenrek
2015-02-21 10:50 ` Giacomo Tesio
2015-02-21 11:51 ` cinap_lenrek
2015-02-21 18:46 ` Giacomo Tesio
2015-02-21 19:50 ` mischief [this message]
2015-02-21 20:46 ` cinap_lenrek
2015-02-21 21:57 ` Giacomo Tesio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71CF92B8-D188-4871-94CD-5FA73DFF38FA@9.offblast.org \
--to=mischief@9.offblast.org \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
--cc=giacomo@tesio.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).