release testing

release testing

[cinap_lenrek]

preparing for a new 9front release:

http://lux.felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrek/9front/changes.txt
http://lux.felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrek/9front/9front-6703.d310bf4b5f74.386.iso.gz

inquiering on:

- any changes that we dont want to wait another 4 moths to be on the iso

- any bugs and regressions that you know about

- ART

--
cinap

Re: [9front] release testing

[hiro]

about the ART subject: if i understand correctly lucio offered a
permanent or temporary installation of 9front in the South African
National (Art) Gallery

my /n/dump is something weird

[karisawa]

Hello,

thanks for new release.

by the way, I have been in trouble.
my /n/dump is something weird.

two monthes ago, there was a power outage with the sudden thunder.
I guess that made the problem.

hebe% 9fs dump
hebe% ls /n/dump
/n/dump/2015
/n/dump/2016
/n/dump/2017
/n/dump/2018
hebe% ls /n/dump/2018
/n/dump/2018/0101
/n/dump/2018/0102
...
/n/dump/2018/0903
/n/dump/2018/crc32
/n/dump/2018/gcpu
...
/n/dump/2018/zip

# I don't know why crc32 etc are shown there.
# perhaps they are files in /amd64/bin

hebe% ls /n/dump/2018/0706
...	# OK
hebe% ls /n/dump/2018/0707
ls: /n/dump/2018/0707: '/n/dump/2018/0707' does not exist

# 0706 is the last effective dump

Kernel message is:
checktag pc=2010df ow"/dev/sdE0/fscache"w"/dev/sdE1/fsworm"(c) tag/path=Tdir/1233; expected Tdir/1

hebe% ls -lq /n
(000056255b16efb9 0 80) d-r-xr-xr-x M 788 sys sys 0 Sep  3 16:29 /n/dump
(0000000000000001 6 80) d-r-xr-xr-x M 805 adm adm 0 Nov 28  2015 /n/other

# the qid is something weird

hebe% 9fs dump
hebe% ls -lq /n
(0000000000000001 4 80) d-r-xr-xr-x M 924 adm adm 0 Jan  1  2018 /n/dump
(0000000000000001 6 80) d-r-xr-xr-x M 805 adm adm 0 Nov 28  2015 /n/other
hebe% 

I did 'check tag' in fs console, but nothing improved.

the weirdness comes from cwfs.

cfs dump
current fs is "dump"

fstat /2018/0706
name = 0706
uid = -1; gid = -1; muid = 0
size = 0; qid = 80000001/22
atime = 1530853210; mtime = 1530853210
dblock = 4415041 0 0 0 0 0; iblocks[0] = 0; iblocks[1] = 0; iblocks[2] = 0; iblocks[3] = 0

fstat /2018/0707
cant stat /2018/0707

should I reconstruct my file system?

any hint welcome!

Kenji Arisawa

Re: [9front] release testing

[Stanley Lieber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1090 bytes --]

On Sep 2, 2018, at 8:01 AM, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote:
> 
> preparing for a new 9front release:
> 
> http://lux.felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrek/9front/changes.txt
> http://lux.felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrek/9front/9front-6703.d310bf4b5f74.386.iso.gz
> 
> inquiering on:
> 
> - any changes that we dont want to wait another 4 moths to be on the iso
> 
> - any bugs and regressions that you know about
> 
> - ART

Working on making the new release’s dash1 manual available in print, via Amazon. Considerable work still needs to be done on formatting the interior, but I have cover images for a proposed 9FRONT “RUN FROM ZONE!” release:

http://img.stanleylieber.com/src/21065/img/1536277558.png

http://img.stanleylieber.com/src/21067/img/1536277577.png

Images from khm’s tour of a (now inactive) uranium production facility will also be featured on the interior, including the “run from zone” instructions:

http://img.stanleylieber.com/src/21066/img/1536277571.png

Is this ISO going to be the release? If so, I can go ahead and push it soon.

sl


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2019 bytes --]

Re: [9front] release testing

[Kurt H Maier]

On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 06:24:00PM -0400, Stanley Lieber wrote:
> 
> Images from khm’s tour of a (now inactive) uranium production facility will also be featured on the interior, including the “run from zone” instructions:
> 

Pedantry:  the facility was produced plutonium _from_ uranium, at a
ratio of about 7oz of plutonium per ton of uranium. 

khm

Re: [9front] release testing

[Stanley Lieber]

On Sep 8, 2018, at 7:36 PM, Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 06:24:00PM -0400, Stanley Lieber wrote:
>> 
>> Images from khm’s tour of a (now inactive) uranium production facility will also be featured on the interior, including the “run from zone” instructions:
>> 
> 
> Pedantry:  the facility was produced plutonium _from_ uranium, at a
> ratio of about 7oz of plutonium per ton of uranium. 

impossible

sl