From: Anthony Martin <ality@pbrane.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] libsec: add minimal support for the tls renegotiation extension
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:05:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8sCIZbVVtT8msWF@alice> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XMJybj82PETOXxRpB7pGKdZTbNQMC_rdzJy=FMrqiaqvA@mail.gmail.com>
hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> once said:
> On 11/10/22, Anthony Martin <ality@pbrane.org> wrote:
> > OpenSSL 3.0 clients refuse to connect to servers that do not
> > support the renegotiation extension (RFC 5746)
>
> why? what's the logic behind it?
"It has been more than a decade since RFC 5746 was published,
so there has been plenty of time for implmentation support to
roll out."
- Benjamin Kaduk¹
Remember, they continue to support renegotiation in TLS
versions before 1.3 and it's insecure² without the RFC 5746
mitigation. It was removed in TLS 1.3. The Plan 9 TLS code
never supported it. Annoyance or clairvoyance? Who knows.
Cheers,
Anthony
1. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/72d2670bd21becfa6a64bb03fa55ad82d6d0c0f3
2. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/N7EcRpvK2ENs5IwWYv2p7nrUG8w/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-10 2:24 Anthony Martin
2023-01-18 15:07 ` [9front] " Anthony Martin
2023-01-19 4:30 ` [9front] " ori
2023-01-19 4:48 ` ori
2022-11-10 2:24 ` Anthony Martin
2023-01-28 21:20 ` ori
2023-01-28 21:59 ` cinap_lenrek
2023-01-19 9:50 ` Anthony Martin
2023-01-20 12:12 ` hiro
2023-01-20 21:05 ` Anthony Martin [this message]
2023-01-20 22:33 ` hiro
2023-01-21 3:48 ` Anthony Martin
2023-01-21 12:54 ` hiro
2023-01-21 17:29 ` Steve Simon
2023-01-22 16:00 ` hiro
2023-01-22 7:55 ` Anthony Martin
2023-01-22 16:10 ` hiro
2023-01-23 11:18 ` Anthony Martin
2023-01-23 13:16 ` hiro
2023-01-23 14:24 ` Ori Bernstein
2023-01-23 14:29 ` Ori Bernstein
2023-01-24 0:14 ` hiro
2023-01-24 0:16 ` hiro
2023-01-25 16:19 ` kemal
2023-01-25 16:39 ` hiro
2023-01-25 17:07 ` kemal
2023-01-25 17:18 ` hiro
2023-01-25 17:30 ` kemal
2023-01-25 17:36 ` kemal
2023-01-26 20:54 ` hiro
2023-01-26 21:52 ` Frank D. Engel, Jr.
2023-01-27 6:11 ` kemal
2023-01-27 10:55 ` hiro
2023-01-27 17:38 ` kemal
2023-01-23 16:23 ` hiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8sCIZbVVtT8msWF@alice \
--to=ality@pbrane.org \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).