caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@ontil.ihep.su>
Cc: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml packaging problems
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:04:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020430200405.A16880@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204301720320.27777-100000@ontil.ihep.su>; from vsl@ontil.ihep.su on Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:28:38PM +0400

On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:28:38PM +0400, Vitaly Lugovsky wrote:
> 
>  Hi!
> 
>  I'm having a big troubles packaging OCaml and 3rd party
> libraries (like lablGL, lablgtk) in RPM. All the evil is in 
> the ld.conf file - foreign libraries should add lines in 
> it at the installation.

Have a look at the debian package and the solution we have adopted there.

Basically there are now 3 different files :

/usr/lib/ocaml/ld.conf (the normal one) which is autogenerated by ocaml-ldconf
from the two other ones.

/etc/ocaml/ld.conf which can be filled by the administrator to override the
dpkg generated one. (it has per line, a directory, and the command word
add/addafter/remove).

/var/lib/ocaml/ld.conf which is filled by a special prerm/postinst script, and
contains, not only the directory to add to ld.conf, but also the package
where this path originate. a package can provide more than one such path.

It works rather nicely, altough the ocaml-ldconf program could use some
enhancement (i wrote it hastily, but it does the job and was further
fool-tested during the debian testing process).

If this seems agreable to you, feel free to reuse any part of this scheme (the
ocaml-ldconf.ml file is GPLed though, there is a basic manpage i think, and i
don't think the debhelper scripts would be usefull in a rpm context).

I also needed to add a small patch to ocam lso it will not accept comment in
the ld.conf file, but apart form that, no changes were needed.

If more people like this scheme, it could even be considered for upstream
adoption.

>  The much better approach to the multi-package configurations
> is introduced, e.g. in xinetd, new crontabs, and so on - all
> external packages writes their configuration files or even
> just a symlinks to the special directory. So, it'll be better to
> have a special directory like ld.conf.dir/ with symlinks to
> the actual dynamic library paths, which will be updated safely
> when new packages are installed/removed. But, we've no directory

That would be another solution, 

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-30 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-22 13:07 [Caml-list] Project Proposals Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-04-30  9:16 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-04-30 13:28   ` [Caml-list] OCaml packaging problems Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-04-30 15:08     ` Remi VANICAT
2002-04-30 18:04     ` Sven [this message]
2002-05-14  8:54       ` Xavier Leroy
2002-05-14 10:45         ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-05-14 15:46           ` Xavier Leroy
2002-05-14 11:39         ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-14 13:54           ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-14 23:28             ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-15 12:10           ` Sven Luther
2002-05-14 13:49         ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-14 22:52         ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-05-15  1:18           ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-15 12:05         ` Sven Luther
2002-05-15 17:39           ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-16  7:11             ` Sven Luther
2002-05-16 10:24               ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-16 18:52                 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-05-17 16:05                 ` Sven Luther
2002-05-17 19:31                   ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-18 10:39                     ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-21 19:54                     ` Sven Luther
2002-06-13 15:50         ` Sven Luther
2002-06-18 12:57           ` Xavier Leroy
2002-06-18 13:32             ` Sven Luther
2002-06-18 20:04               ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-06-19  6:33                 ` Sven Luther
2002-06-19 11:09                   ` Markus Mottl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020430200405.A16880@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
    --to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=vsl@ontil.ihep.su \
    --cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).