caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
To: Sven Luther <luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>,
	Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>,
	Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@ontil.ihep.su>,
	caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml packaging problems
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:04:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020618220402.A629@ice.gerd-stolpmann.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020618133253.GA30437@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>; from luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr on Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 15:32:53 +0200


On 2002.06.18 15:32 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> > > 1)  What will be the exact name of these directories ? It would be a good
> > > idea, i think at least, if we choose the same name for all
> > > installations of ocaml, and not everyone choosing it's own directory.
> > > (or else we could have a ocaml option similar to -where which would
> > > give a pointer to these directories ? and have the choice of the
> > > directory highly configurable, maybe a -where_stub or something such ?)
> > > 
> > > Actually i have the proposition of "shlibs" from you, and "libexec" from
> > > Gerd and the findlib people. and then i feel myself "stublibs" should be
> > > a nice name too, especially since it is just the sub libraries we are
> > > speaking about, and not the .cma and other such ocaml libraries.
> > 
> > My proposal for "shlibs" was just for the sake of example, and isn't
> > very descriptive.  I like "stublibs" or "libexec" better, actually.
> 
> I would go for stublibs myself, but the findlib folk seems keen on
> libexec. Maybe we should have a long discution here on that, or you
> would decide and we keep that, i don't know, i would need more opinion
> on this.

There is no traditional name for the directory containing dynamically loaded 
libraries, i.e. libraries that are not linked with "-l" into the executable.
"libexec" is intended for executables that are run as a result of library
calls, and that are not in PATH. I chose "libexec" because that was most
close to DLLs.

I don't know if this is a good name, however, and I can change it again in 
the findlib distribution. I think the point is whether everybody familiar
with filesystem conventions finds the DLL directory immediately.

Gerd
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann      Telefon: +49 6151 997705 (privat)
Viktoriastr. 45             
64293 Darmstadt     EMail:   gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
Germany                     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2002-06-18 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-22 13:07 [Caml-list] Project Proposals Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-04-30  9:16 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-04-30 13:28   ` [Caml-list] OCaml packaging problems Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-04-30 15:08     ` Remi VANICAT
2002-04-30 18:04     ` Sven
2002-05-14  8:54       ` Xavier Leroy
2002-05-14 10:45         ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-05-14 15:46           ` Xavier Leroy
2002-05-14 11:39         ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-14 13:54           ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-14 23:28             ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-15 12:10           ` Sven Luther
2002-05-14 13:49         ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-14 22:52         ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-05-15  1:18           ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-15 12:05         ` Sven Luther
2002-05-15 17:39           ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-16  7:11             ` Sven Luther
2002-05-16 10:24               ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-16 18:52                 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-05-17 16:05                 ` Sven Luther
2002-05-17 19:31                   ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-18 10:39                     ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-21 19:54                     ` Sven Luther
2002-06-13 15:50         ` Sven Luther
2002-06-18 12:57           ` Xavier Leroy
2002-06-18 13:32             ` Sven Luther
2002-06-18 20:04               ` Gerd Stolpmann [this message]
2002-06-19  6:33                 ` Sven Luther
2002-06-19 11:09                   ` Markus Mottl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020618220402.A629@ice.gerd-stolpmann.de \
    --to=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=vsl@ontil.ihep.su \
    --cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).