From: Michal Moskal <malekith@pld-linux.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml packaging problems
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:49:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020514134902.GA4521@ep09.kernel.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020514105452.B11894@pauillac.inria.fr>
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:54:52AM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> So, to summarize, I strongly suggest the following approach for RPMs
> or Debian packages:
> - The main Caml package can add one or two lines to ld.conf,
> e.g. /var/lib/ocaml/shlibs (for libraries installed by other packages)
> and /usr/local/lib/ocaml/shlibs (for local stuff)
> - Packages for additional Caml libraries install their shared libraries
> in /var/lib/ocaml/shlibs, either directly or via a symlink.
Hmm.. when perparing rpms with OCaml packages for PLD Linux I first
created /usr/lib/ocaml/dlls and put dll*.so from all packages (including
main OCaml package) there directly. However it caused problems with
ocamlmktop (IIRC, ocamlc worked fine), so I ended up with dllfoo*.so
in /usr/lib/ocaml/foo and symlinks in /usr/lib/ocaml (and just
/usr/lib/ocaml in ld.conf).
AFAIK /var/lib/ocaml isn't good place for installation on any binary
stuff. /usr/lib/ocaml should be used, as it can be read only. /var is
for data that programs change. There is nothing to change in dynamic
library after it is installed. Please reffer to FHS for details.
--
: Michal Moskal :::::::: malekith/at/pld.org.pl : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-14 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-22 13:07 [Caml-list] Project Proposals Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-04-30 9:16 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-04-30 13:28 ` [Caml-list] OCaml packaging problems Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-04-30 15:08 ` Remi VANICAT
2002-04-30 18:04 ` Sven
2002-05-14 8:54 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-05-14 10:45 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-05-14 15:46 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-05-14 11:39 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-14 13:54 ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-14 23:28 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-15 12:10 ` Sven Luther
2002-05-14 13:49 ` Michal Moskal [this message]
2002-05-14 22:52 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-05-15 1:18 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-05-15 12:05 ` Sven Luther
2002-05-15 17:39 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-16 7:11 ` Sven Luther
2002-05-16 10:24 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-16 18:52 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-05-17 16:05 ` Sven Luther
2002-05-17 19:31 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-05-18 10:39 ` Michal Moskal
2002-05-21 19:54 ` Sven Luther
2002-06-13 15:50 ` Sven Luther
2002-06-18 12:57 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-06-18 13:32 ` Sven Luther
2002-06-18 20:04 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-06-19 6:33 ` Sven Luther
2002-06-19 11:09 ` Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020514134902.GA4521@ep09.kernel.pl \
--to=malekith@pld-linux.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).