* [Caml-list] who wants to use swig?
@ 2011-01-04 17:43 Joel Reymont
2011-01-04 18:09 ` Adrien
2011-01-04 18:43 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Reymont @ 2011-01-04 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Folks,
Is there a large number of people here wanting to use SWIG bindings for OCaml?
Do you all wrap large-surface APIs manually and are happy doing so?
Thanks, Joel
---
http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] who wants to use swig?
2011-01-04 17:43 [Caml-list] who wants to use swig? Joel Reymont
@ 2011-01-04 18:09 ` Adrien
2011-01-04 18:43 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adrien @ 2011-01-04 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Reymont; +Cc: caml-list
Hi,
At least graphviz-ocaml relies on SWIG. I know it, I've just had the
same issue as you did when trying to get an ocaml-enabled swig.
I was thinking about falling back to the "dumb" command-line interface
of graphviz (meaning calling external binaries) but if you need
testing, I can also try your patch(es).
Regards,
Adrien Nader
On 04/01/2011, Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Is there a large number of people here wanting to use SWIG bindings for
> OCaml?
>
> Do you all wrap large-surface APIs manually and are happy doing so?
>
> Thanks, Joel
>
> ---
> http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] who wants to use swig?
2011-01-04 17:43 [Caml-list] who wants to use swig? Joel Reymont
2011-01-04 18:09 ` Adrien
@ 2011-01-04 18:43 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hezekiah M. Carty @ 2011-01-04 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Reymont; +Cc: caml-list
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a large number of people here wanting to use SWIG bindings for OCaml?
>
> Do you all wrap large-surface APIs manually and are happy doing so?
>
I would like to use SWIG. That said, for the range of functions it
works for, camlidl seems to provide much cleaner bindings to C
libraries than SWIG. If SWIG could be used to create similarly clean
bindings without requiring a syntax extension or very verbose OCaml
code then it would be much more attractive.
Hez
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] who wants to use swig?
@ 2011-01-04 20:55 rubyfan
2011-01-04 20:58 ` Alexy Khrabrov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: rubyfan @ 2011-01-04 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
I'd like to use swig. I was going use it to try wrapping ZeroMQ.... but I
think this is what you're doing as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-04 21:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-04 17:43 [Caml-list] who wants to use swig? Joel Reymont
2011-01-04 18:09 ` Adrien
2011-01-04 18:43 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
2011-01-04 20:55 rubyfan
2011-01-04 20:58 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2011-01-04 21:09 ` Joel Reymont
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).