Re: **EXTERN** Re: Saving old papers on CT

[John Baez <john.baez@ucr.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1654 bytes --]

Hi -

Thomas Streicher wrote:

I was told to make an official submission but could not find any form
for that. Rather have the impression that these things are decided by some
responsible board. It is their decision but it might be helpful to
express on the cat-list whether one is interested in the preservation
of this material. Just to find out whether it is worth the effort to
retype those things.

I think it would be a good idea.   The TAC website says:

After obtaining written permission from any copyright holder, any three TAC Editors
may propose a work for TAC Reprints to the Managing Editor. The proposal will
be reported to all Editors.

There are probably three TAC editors reading this now, but you could also contact
several of them and suggest doing this.  They are listed on the TAC website.

I don't think the TAC editors should bear the whole burden of seeking old category
theory articles worth reprinting.  There should be some mechanism to bring such
papers to their attention.

Best,
jb



You're receiving this message because you're a member of the Categories mailing list group from Macquarie University. To take part in this conversation, reply all to this message.

View group files<https://outlook.office365.com/owa/categories@mq.edu.au/groupsubscription.ashx?source=EscalatedMessage&action=files&GuestId=4eb9b40c-9b3a-48a5-9781-836e5a171e8b>   |   Leave group<https://outlook.office365.com/owa/categories@mq.edu.au/groupsubscription.ashx?source=EscalatedMessage&action=leave&GuestId=4eb9b40c-9b3a-48a5-9781-836e5a171e8b>   |   Learn more about Microsoft 365 Groups<https://aka.ms/o365g>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4524 bytes --]