From: Colin McLarty <colin.mclarty@case.edu>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: categorical foundations
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:24:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1N91j9-0004j5-9K@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1N8PH9-0007b6-Qv@mailserv.mta.ca>
Sorry. I did misunderstand that. But I still do not understand it.
What is a "formal basis" of a theory T? Is any subtheory of T? Or is
it any conceptually significant subtheory? (In the latter case I
would not call it a "formal" basis.)
Is it supposed to be a general rule that if a theory T has a "formal
basis" then T cannot be a satisfactory foundation?
The Eilenberg-MacLane axioms are a subtheory of CCAF and also have a
natural, conceptually central interpretation in CCAF. I consider this
an insight, Bill's insight, and I do not see how it becomes any kind
of objection to CCAF.
best, Colin
2009/11/13 <Andre.Rodin@ens.fr>:
> Selon Colin McLarty <colin.mclarty@case.edu>:
>
>> 2009/11/12 <Andre.Rodin@ens.fr>:
>>
>> writes
>>
>> > ETCS is the formal basis of CCAF.
>>
>
>
> I did NOT write this. I wrote "ETC is the formal basis of CCAF", please check my
> message. By ETC I mean the Elementary Theory of Categories. (You might take my
> ETC for a typo perhaps.)
>
> best
> Andrei
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 16:38 pragmatic foundation Colin McLarty
2009-11-12 8:25 ` Vaughan Pratt
2009-11-12 10:36 ` topos and magic Andre Joyal
2009-11-13 19:34 ` Vaughan Pratt
2009-11-12 15:59 ` Colin McLarty
2009-11-13 0:42 ` categorical foundations Andre.Rodin
2009-11-13 1:29 ` Colin McLarty
2009-11-13 9:24 ` Andre.Rodin
2009-11-13 17:49 ` infinity Andre Joyal
2009-11-13 13:24 ` Colin McLarty [this message]
2009-11-15 19:02 ` categorical foundations Andre.Rodin
2009-11-14 22:52 ` pragmatic foundation Eduardo J. Dubuc
2009-11-15 19:57 ` Zinovy Diskin
2009-11-15 20:44 ` Vaughan Pratt
2009-11-16 2:07 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
2009-11-16 14:54 Re: categorical foundations Colin McLarty
2009-11-17 1:39 ` Charles Wells
2009-11-18 12:56 ` Andre.Rodin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1N91j9-0004j5-9K@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=colin.mclarty@case.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).