From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>,
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>,
ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: splitting working now : some issues/questions
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:35:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2baammp143.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2mxqmw4k2.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:38:53 +0200")
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> "spam" means "spam" folder on this server
>
> Actually it means the "spam" group on the default server
> (gnus-select-method).
I was being hypothetical about what I feel it should be for consistency
with other settings.
Here, I'll replace what you snipped to make it clear again:
,----
| Yes, but why? If you are working a group in a certain server and
| something operates on that server, unqualified makes a lot more sense
| and is simply more convenient keeping in mind the manual talking about
| not qualifying in other such settings. "spam" means "spam" folder on
| this server, "nnml+otherserver:spam" means something else.
`----
I'm not saying this to be difficult - its what I assumed it would be
keeping in mind the caveats on other settings NOT being qualified so
that they do indeed default to the current server.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-10 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 7:28 Richard Riley
2010-10-07 20:02 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 14:46 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-08 17:30 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-09 15:57 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-10 0:38 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 1:09 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 6:13 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-10 6:57 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 8:46 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-10 10:17 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 13:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-10 14:35 ` Richard Riley [this message]
2010-10-10 15:04 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-10 16:28 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-11 13:37 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-11 13:55 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 7:27 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 11:10 ` Richard Riley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2baammp143.fsf@news.eternal-september.org \
--to=rileyrg@googlemail.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=tzz@lifelogs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).