From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
To: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: splitting working now : some issues/questions
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:57:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <q6bp72v8kh.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sk0ek21m.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:13:57 -0500")
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:09:55 +0200 Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> RR> Could (or should) the group parameter spam destination please default to
> RR> the groups server? Currently if I set the spam dest as an unqualified
> RR> Gnus-Spam for my nnimap server then its going to nnml:Gnus-Spam. I need
> RR> to currently fully qualify it to e.g nnimap+riley:Gnus-Spam.
>
> I think it should behave like a regular group name, which is the
> behaviour you're noting.
>
> Ted
I am wondering why this would be better since unqualified is more
"local" and is the way for things like spam-split and spam-inbox. If
working on a group that belongs to a server it seems logical that merely
setting a group destination without fully qualifier such as
"nnimap+riles" means on that current group's server on not on some other
such as nnml which may, or may not, be random depending on select order.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-10 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 7:28 Richard Riley
2010-10-07 20:02 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 14:46 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-08 17:30 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-09 15:57 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-10 0:38 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 1:09 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 6:13 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-10 6:57 ` Richard Riley [this message]
2010-10-10 8:46 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-10 10:17 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 13:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-10 14:35 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 15:04 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-10 16:28 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-11 13:37 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-11 13:55 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 7:27 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-10 11:10 ` Richard Riley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=q6bp72v8kh.fsf@news.eternal-september.org \
--to=rileyrg@googlemail.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=tzz@lifelogs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).