* spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles
@ 2003-01-21 16:37 David Z Maze
2003-01-21 16:55 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Z Maze @ 2003-01-21 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
Yet another issue with ifile support in spam.el: I get a false
negative, and mail winds up in, say, mail.misc.impersonal rather than
mail.misc.spam. I find the message and hit 'S x' without reading it,
and exit the group. The article gets marked 'H', and on exit gets
moved to mail.misc.spam, good. But looking at my .idata file, it
appears that ifile never gets called on the message.
Do I need to cause gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-ifile on all groups,
not just my spam group? Or is there something more insiduous going on?
--
David Maze dmaze@mit.edu http://www.mit.edu/~dmaze/
"Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal."
-- Abra Mitchell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles
2003-01-21 16:37 spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles David Z Maze
@ 2003-01-21 16:55 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-01-21 18:01 ` Andreas Fuchs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2003-01-21 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, dmaze@MIT.EDU wrote:
> Yet another issue with ifile support in spam.el: I get a false
> negative, and mail winds up in, say, mail.misc.impersonal rather
> than mail.misc.spam. I find the message and hit 'S x' without
> reading it, and exit the group. The article gets marked 'H', and on
> exit gets moved to mail.misc.spam, good. But looking at my .idata
> file, it appears that ifile never gets called on the message.
>
> Do I need to cause gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-ifile on all
> groups, not just my spam group? Or is there something more
> insiduous going on?
The former. Spam exit processors apply to all groups, but have to be
specifically requested in the group parameters (through `G c' or a
regex match). I would match the ifile spam exit processor with all
mail groups, since it will only get called on spam-marked articles
anywhere.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles
2003-01-21 16:55 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2003-01-21 18:01 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-21 18:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Fuchs @ 2003-01-21 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Today, Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> The former. Spam exit processors apply to all groups, but have to be
> specifically requested in the group parameters (through `G c' or a
> regex match). I would match the ifile spam exit processor with all
> mail groups, since it will only get called on spam-marked articles
> anywhere.
It's probably worth noting that "nnml:.*" is a good regexp to use if
you read mail over nnml only.
spam.el is beginning to feel good to use now... Could you add messages
in the exit processors, so that it's clearer when spam.el routines are
at work?
Happy hacking,
--
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs,
who just noticed that gnus-spam-process-destinations does exactly what he
proposed in the other thread. (-:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles
2003-01-21 18:01 ` Andreas Fuchs
@ 2003-01-21 18:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-01-21 18:45 ` Andreas Fuchs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2003-01-21 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, asf@void.at wrote:
> It's probably worth noting that "nnml:.*" is a good regexp to use if
> you read mail over nnml only.
Right, I didn't want to assume nnml...
> spam.el is beginning to feel good to use now... Could you add
> messages in the exit processors, so that it's clearer when spam.el
> routines are at work?
I was trying to avoid too much verbosity. I can use gnus-verbose, but
what messages would you suggest?
Thanks
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles
2003-01-21 18:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2003-01-21 18:45 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-24 5:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Fuchs @ 2003-01-21 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
Today, Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, asf@void.at wrote:
>> It's probably worth noting that "nnml:.*" is a good regexp to use if
>> you read mail over nnml only.
> Right, I didn't want to assume nnml...
That's ok, I just wanted to mention it, because it didn't seem so
obvious that you should use the ^backend: to match all groups in a
backend. (:
Maybe put some hints about this into the docstring of the regexp lists?
>> spam.el is beginning to feel good to use now... Could you add
>> messages in the exit processors, so that it's clearer when spam.el
>> routines are at work?
> I was trying to avoid too much verbosity. I can use gnus-verbose, but
> what messages would you suggest?
I had "Reclassifying/Moving spam/ham articles...", "Reclassifying/Moving
spam/ham articles...done.", in mind, nothing more. Just something that
tells the user that a) spam.el is correctly set up and b) that emacs
hasn't crashed (-:
Thank you,
--
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles
2003-01-21 18:45 ` Andreas Fuchs
@ 2003-01-24 5:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2003-01-24 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, asf@void.at wrote:
>>> spam.el is beginning to feel good to use now... Could you add
>>> messages in the exit processors, so that it's clearer when spam.el
>>> routines are at work?
>> I was trying to avoid too much verbosity. I can use gnus-verbose,
>> but what messages would you suggest?
>
> I had "Reclassifying/Moving spam/ham articles...",
> "Reclassifying/Moving spam/ham articles...done.", in mind, nothing
> more. Just something that tells the user that a) spam.el is
> correctly set up and b) that emacs hasn't crashed (-:
I tried to do this - if you spot any places that need more or less
messages, let me know.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-24 5:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-21 16:37 spam.el+ifile doesn't notice 'S x'd articles David Z Maze
2003-01-21 16:55 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-01-21 18:01 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-21 18:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-01-21 18:45 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-24 5:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).