From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Cc: "Stefan Reichör" <xsteve@riic.at>, ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: spam-split with bogofilter
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:35:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4nel504fvd.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <shn0jo4izh.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> (Karl Eichwalder's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:28:34 +0100")
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, keichwa@gmx.net wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>
>> (setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups
>> '(("nnml:mail\\..*"
>> (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
>> gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter)))
>> gnus-spam-process-destinations '(("nnml:mail\\..*"
>> "nnml:spambox")) spam-junk-mailgroups '("nnml:spambox")
>> spam-split-group "nnml:spambox")
>>
>> "nnml:spambox" does not match the spam-exit-processor or the
>> ham-exit-processor you have selected. What you have will process
>> spam and ham only when you're in a "nnml:mail.*" group. Which is
>> OK, since you have spam-process-destination set to go to
>> "nnml:spambox" so the processed spam will go there. It's just that
>> in "nnml:spambox" nothing will happen.
>
> Is it okay to add spambox this way:
>
> (setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups
> '(("nnml:\\(mail\\..*\\|spambox\\)"
> ;; ^^^^^^^^ add spambox here?
> (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
> gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter)))
That works, you can also put a separate entry in the list variable -
customize it and you'll see what I mean. I think that's cleaner
(IMHO) than compound regular expressions.
> Is it necessary to provide a gnus-ham-process-destinations setting,
> too?
It's necessary iff you want ham, when processed, to go somewhere else
when you are in a spam group. Since you said you want that, it is
necessary to set the ham-process-destination parameter.
> How?
Do 'G c' on "spambox" to customize the group parameters, or customize
the variable gnus-ham-process-destinations.
> I want false positives to go thru the usual split procedure.
There's no "respooling" action yet, you can only set
ham-process-destination to a group name. If you *really* want to
respool, I guess we can add a 'respool option to the
spam/ham-process-destination parameters, in addition to a group name.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-21 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-20 19:02 Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-20 21:28 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 6:23 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 8:13 ` Stefan Reichör
2003-03-21 17:25 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 18:49 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 19:28 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 20:35 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2003-03-22 18:40 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-23 23:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 18:44 ` Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4nel504fvd.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=xsteve@riic.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).