From: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@gmx.net>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: spam-split with bogofilter
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <shn0jo4izh.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4n3clgtv0e.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:49:37 -0500")
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> (setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups
> '(("nnml:mail\\..*" (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
> gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter)))
> gnus-spam-process-destinations '(("nnml:mail\\..*" "nnml:spambox"))
> spam-junk-mailgroups '("nnml:spambox")
> spam-split-group "nnml:spambox")
>
> "nnml:spambox" does not match the spam-exit-processor or the
> ham-exit-processor you have selected. What you have will process spam
> and ham only when you're in a "nnml:mail.*" group. Which is OK, since
> you have spam-process-destination set to go to "nnml:spambox" so the
> processed spam will go there. It's just that in "nnml:spambox"
> nothing will happen.
Is it okay to add spambox this way:
(setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups
'(("nnml:\\(mail\\..*\\|spambox\\)"
;; ^^^^^^^^ add spambox here?
(gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter)))
gnus-spam-process-destinations '(("nnml:mail\\..*" "nnml:spambox"))
spam-junk-mailgroups '("spambox") ;; no "nnml:" prefix here
spam-split-group "spambox") ;; likewise
Is it necessary to provide a gnus-ham-process-destinations setting,
too? How? I want false positives to go thru the usual split procedure.
--
ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home): |
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-21 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-20 19:02 Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-20 21:28 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 6:23 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 8:13 ` Stefan Reichör
2003-03-21 17:25 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 18:49 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 19:28 ` Karl Eichwalder [this message]
2003-03-21 20:35 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-22 18:40 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-23 23:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 18:44 ` Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=shn0jo4izh.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de \
--to=keichwa@gmx.net \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).