From: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: spam-split with bogofilter
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:40:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <shof442aqw.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4nel504fvd.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:35:50 -0500")
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> That works, you can also put a separate entry in the list variable -
> customize it and you'll see what I mean. I think that's cleaner
> (IMHO) than compound regular expressions.
[...]
> It's necessary iff you want ham, when processed, to go somewhere else
> when you are in a spam group. Since you said you want that, it is
> necessary to set the ham-process-destination parameter.
Now these are my settings:
(setq spam-use-bogofilter t)
(setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups
'(("nnml:mail\\..*"
(gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))
("nnml:spambox"
(gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter)))
gnus-spam-process-destinations '(("nnml:mail\\..*" "nnml:spambox"))
gnus-ham-process-destinations '(("nnml:spambox" "nnml:mail.rest"))
spam-junk-mailgroups '("spambox")
spam-split-group "spambox")
(setq gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents
'(("nnml:spambox" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)
("nnml:mail\\.spambox" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)
("nnml:.*" gnus-group-spam-classification-ham)))
> Do 'G c' on "spambox" to customize the group parameters, or customize
> the variable gnus-ham-process-destinations.
Done. But unmarking a message in "spambox" und quitting this group
is not enough to register the message as ham and move it back to the
mail.rest group.
Currently this workaround does the trick for me.
. Unmark message
. Widen the message (C-u g)
. Go to the article buffer (C-x o) and mark the message (C-x h)
. Call bogofilter on the message to register it as ham
(M-| bogofilter -n RET)
. C-x o
. Respool the message (B r)
The more false positives are registered the less I'll have to do this
manual intervention ;-) Thus far I'm quite happy with the spam
detection now. Thanks for all your help!
(BTW, I don't use customize because it looks too confusing to me or --
for simple variables it's overkill.)
--
ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home): |
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-22 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-20 19:02 Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-20 21:28 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 6:23 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 8:13 ` Stefan Reichör
2003-03-21 17:25 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 18:49 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 19:28 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-03-21 20:35 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-22 18:40 ` Karl Eichwalder [this message]
2003-03-23 23:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-21 18:44 ` Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=shof442aqw.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de \
--to=keichwa@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).