Re: Some spam messages are not sorted into the corresponding group

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Sun, 02 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> 
>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote:
>>> Some mails which are quite apparently spam (i. e. have spamicity
>>> values of about 0.9952959048) are not sorted into the group they
>>> should be sorted to.
>>> 
>>> I use bogofilter as a mailfilter and (: spam-split) for
>>> splitting. `S t' shows the proper spamicity.
>>> 
>>> Is this a bug or am I doing anything wrong?
>>
>> Are you using spam-use-bogofilter-headers or spam-use-bogofilter?
> 
> I use spam-use-bogofilter.

Just to make sure: you do not pre-process mail with Bogofilter, right?
It should come to you unmodified (without a X-Bogosity headers) if you
have spam-use-bogofilter turned on.

>> What does spam-check-bogofilter or spam-check-bogofilter-headers
>> return when you run it in the article buffer?
> 
> "junk" -- `B t' though returns this:
> 
> (: spam-split)
> "mail.misc"
> 
> ("mail.misc" is not meant for spam.)
> 
>> Can you show an example of a broken Bogofilter header?
> 
> X-Bogosity: Spam, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=1.0000000000,
> version=0.10.1.3.cvs.20030130

I get the correct output on that.  Could something else in your split
methods be matching?  Can you show your split methods?  Also, can you
hit `t' on that article to show the whole body, then 
`M-: (spam-split)' to see what spam-split thinks about the message?

Thanks
Ted