Re: Some spam messages are not sorted into the corresponding group

[Christopher Splinter <chris@splinter.inka.de>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote:
>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>>> Are you using spam-use-bogofilter-headers or spam-use-bogofilter?
>> I use spam-use-bogofilter.
> Just to make sure: you do not pre-process mail with Bogofilter, right?

No.

>>> What does spam-check-bogofilter or spam-check-bogofilter-headers
>>> return when you run it in the article buffer?
>> 
>> "junk" -- `B t' though returns this:
>> 
>> (: spam-split)
>> "mail.misc"
>> 
>> ("mail.misc" is not meant for spam.)
>> 
>>> Can you show an example of a broken Bogofilter header?
>> 
>> X-Bogosity: Spam, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=1.0000000000,
>> version=0.10.1.3.cvs.20030130
>
> I get the correct output on that.

(spam-split) used in *Article* (on the full message, of course),
returns "junk", which is the value of spam-split-group.  In spite
of that, the mail's not split properly.

> Could something else in your split methods be matching?

I wouldn't think so, there's only one entry which moves
messages to mail.misc:

(setq nnmail-split-fancy
      '(| (: spam-split)
          [...] 
	  "mail.misc"))

If that's not enough, I can post the rest of the list too; it
wouldn't be very enlightening, though.

> Also, can you hit `t' on that article to show the whole body,
> then `M-: (spam-split)' to see what spam-split thinks about the
> message?

See above.