* Time in Redisplay
@ 2002-09-08 8:29 Scott A Crosby
2002-09-08 8:34 ` Scott A Crosby
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Scott A Crosby @ 2002-09-08 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello, I'm using:
XEmacs 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" [Lucid] (i386-debian-linux, Mule) of Sat Apr 6 2002 on eeyore
Gnus v5.8.8
I've been using my session
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Time in Redisplay
2002-09-08 8:29 Time in Redisplay Scott A Crosby
@ 2002-09-08 8:34 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-09-09 1:25 ` Daniel Pittman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Scott A Crosby @ 2002-09-08 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 08 Sep 2002 03:29:39 -0500, Scott A Crosby <scrosby@cs.rice.edu> writes:
> Hello, I'm using:
>
> XEmacs 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" [Lucid] (i386-debian-linux, Mule) of Sat Apr 6 2002 on eeyore
> Gnus v5.8.8
>
> I've been using my session
My apologies.... I was about to comment in the lunacy of this profile:
Function Name Ticks %/Total Call Count
=============================================== ===== ======= ==========
(in redisplay) 374494 67.116
(in garbage collection) 51996 9.319
next-single-property-change 31473 5.641 9569955
(processing events at top level) 16849 3.020
string-match 7443 1.334 6500752
select-frame 7188 1.288 29466166
ad-Orig-re-search-forward 5997 1.075 2736930
kill-all-local-variables 5560 0.996 200237
lazy-lock-fontify-window 3525 0.632 9593636
get-text-property 3082 0.552 19423541
when I noticed I was accidently running MULE. Does non-MULE run
redisplay signifigantly faster?
Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Time in Redisplay
2002-09-08 8:34 ` Scott A Crosby
@ 2002-09-09 1:25 ` Daniel Pittman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Pittman @ 2002-09-09 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On 08 Sep 2002, Scott A. Crosby wrote:
> On 08 Sep 2002 03:29:39 -0500, Scott A Crosby <scrosby@cs.rice.edu>
> writes:
>
>> Hello, I'm using:
>>
>> XEmacs 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" [Lucid] (i386-debian-linux, Mule)
>> of Sat Apr 6 2002 on eeyore Gnus v5.8.8
>>
>> I've been using my session
>
> My apologies.... I was about to comment in the lunacy of this profile:
>
> Function Name Ticks %/Total Call Count
> =============================================== ===== ======= ==========
> (in redisplay) 374494 67.116
> (in garbage collection) 51996 9.319
> next-single-property-change 31473 5.641 9569955
> (processing events at top level) 16849 3.020
> string-match 7443 1.334 6500752
> select-frame 7188 1.288 29466166
> ad-Orig-re-search-forward 5997 1.075 2736930
> kill-all-local-variables 5560 0.996 200237
> lazy-lock-fontify-window 3525 0.632 9593636
> get-text-property 3082 0.552 19423541
>
> when I noticed I was accidently running MULE. Does non-MULE run
> redisplay signifigantly faster?
Yes.
Well, it does some things faster because it has fixed length character
sequences in the buffers, not variable length. This can result in better
performance.
Daniel
--
When there is a gap betweem one's real and one's declared aims, one turns, as
it were, instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish
squirting out ink.
-- George Orwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-09 1:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-08 8:29 Time in Redisplay Scott A Crosby
2002-09-08 8:34 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-09-09 1:25 ` Daniel Pittman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).