Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names
@ 2011-01-22 13:17 Leonidas Tsampros
  2011-01-22 14:27 ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Reiner Steib
  2011-01-22 18:12 ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Lars Ingebrigtsen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leonidas Tsampros @ 2011-01-22 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ding

Hi guys,

I was bitten by the default value of this variable
(rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names) recently while subscribed to the
info-gnus-english mailing list.

While, it's okay for me since now I have set it to nil permanently in my
.gnus, do you think it's a good idea to document this variable in the
info manual or even change it's default value to nil? Does it even make
sense to ignore all the info- addresses by default in 2011?

I know that this is not part of the Gnus package but it's in rmail, but
since Gnus use this part, I thought it would be a good idea to ask here
first before submitting anything.

Best Regards,
Leonidas Tsampros



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names
  2011-01-22 13:17 rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Leonidas Tsampros
@ 2011-01-22 14:27 ` Reiner Steib
  2011-01-22 16:00   ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Leonidas Tsampros
  2011-01-22 18:12 ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Lars Ingebrigtsen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Reiner Steib @ 2011-01-22 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ding

On Sat, Jan 22 2011, Leonidas Tsampros wrote:

> I was bitten by the default value of this variable
> (rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names) recently while subscribed to the
> info-gnus-english mailing list.
>
> While, it's okay for me since now I have set it to nil permanently in my
> .gnus, do you think it's a good idea to document this variable in the
> info manual or even change it's default value to nil? Does it even make
> sense to ignore all the info- addresses by default in 2011?
>
> I know that this is not part of the Gnus package but it's in rmail, 

Please report it as a bug in Emacs (Rmail).  M-x report-emacs-bug RET.

See <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/10581/focus=91431> /
<news:v9r6eo9361.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>.

> but since Gnus use this part, I thought it would be a good idea to
> ask here first before submitting anything.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names
  2011-01-22 14:27 ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Reiner Steib
@ 2011-01-22 16:00   ` Leonidas Tsampros
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leonidas Tsampros @ 2011-01-22 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ding

Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:

> On Sat, Jan 22 2011, Leonidas Tsampros wrote:
>
>> I was bitten by the default value of this variable
>> (rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names) recently while subscribed to the
>> info-gnus-english mailing list.
>>
>> While, it's okay for me since now I have set it to nil permanently in my
>> .gnus, do you think it's a good idea to document this variable in the
>> info manual or even change it's default value to nil? Does it even make
>> sense to ignore all the info- addresses by default in 2011?
>>
>> I know that this is not part of the Gnus package but it's in rmail,
>
> Please report it as a bug in Emacs (Rmail).  M-x report-emacs-bug RET.

Done!

> See <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/10581/focus=91431> /
> <news:v9r6eo9361.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>.

Thanks for the link. Although I googled it, I didn't stumble upon
that thread.

Just a remark, since Gnus is a consumer of 'rmail-dont-reply-to', maybe
the bug above won't stand a chance of getting fixed/accepted by the
Emacs people. If 'rmail-dont-reply-to' doesn't work or behave to our
liking we would be better off:

1) either documenting it
2) or/and doing what the thread above suggests

What do you think?

>> but since Gnus use this part, I thought it would be a good idea to
>> ask here first before submitting anything.
>
> Bye, Reiner.

Thanks, Leonidas



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names
  2011-01-22 13:17 rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Leonidas Tsampros
  2011-01-22 14:27 ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Reiner Steib
@ 2011-01-22 18:12 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-01-22 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ding

Leonidas Tsampros <ltsampros@upnet.gr> writes:

> While, it's okay for me since now I have set it to nil permanently in my
> .gnus, do you think it's a good idea to document this variable in the
> info manual or even change it's default value to nil? Does it even make
> sense to ignore all the info- addresses by default in 2011?

I think defaulting the variable to nil would be a good idea in Emacs.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-22 18:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-22 13:17 rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Leonidas Tsampros
2011-01-22 14:27 ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Reiner Steib
2011-01-22 16:00   ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Leonidas Tsampros
2011-01-22 18:12 ` rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Lars Ingebrigtsen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).