Re: UTF-8 support has stopped working

[Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>]

Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:

>>>>>> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>:
>
>> I tried mule-ucs in unstable now with both Emacs 20 and XEmacs 21
>> and had no problems with UTF-8.
>
> xemacs21-mule in testing is 21.4.6-8, while unstable is 21.4.12-1(*).
> mule-ucs in testing is 0.84.99rc3-1, while unstable is 0.84.99rc3-2.

I used Emacs 20 and XEmacs 21 from stable, actually, only mule-ucs was
unstable.

> Perhaps I should yank a new xemacs21 and mule-ucs in from unstable?
> Can you confirm that the above deb package version numbers for
> unstable, are the same as the ones that works for you?

I was using XEmacs 21.4.6-8 and mule-ucs 0.84.99rc3-2.

> (*) BTW is the third version number of the upstream version, ie. the
>     number following the second dot, a real version number?  Or is it like
>     GNU Emacs in the old days, the number of times emacs is built from the
>     same unpacked and configured source?

Emacs uses the old version scheme, but for XEmacs it is real upstream
version numbers.