* required packages documentation
@ 2001-02-14 20:34 NAGY Andras
2001-12-31 3:16 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: NAGY Andras @ 2001-02-14 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
Gnus documentation should have a list of (x)emacs packages, which are
either required or recommended for building and running Gnus.
Andras
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: required packages documentation
2001-02-14 20:34 required packages documentation NAGY Andras
@ 2001-12-31 3:16 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-12-31 3:24 ` Simon Josefsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2001-12-31 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
NAGY Andras <nagya@inf.elte.hu> writes:
> Gnus documentation should have a list of (x)emacs packages, which are
> either required or recommended for building and running Gnus.
Yup. I always install everything, so I don't really know which ones I
really need. Does anybody have an overview?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: required packages documentation
2001-12-31 3:16 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2001-12-31 3:24 ` Simon Josefsson
2001-12-31 3:32 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Josefsson @ 2001-12-31 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> NAGY Andras <nagya@inf.elte.hu> writes:
>
>> Gnus documentation should have a list of (x)emacs packages, which are
>> either required or recommended for building and running Gnus.
>
> Yup. I always install everything, so I don't really know which ones I
> really need. Does anybody have an overview?
The Gnus XEmacs package Makefile says
REQUIRES = gnus w3 mh-e mailcrypt rmail eterm mail-lib xemacs-base
fsf-compat
but I'm not sure if it is reliable to document this set of packages,
they might change over time? Maybe documenting that "whatever
packages the Gnus XEmacs package requires", possibly mentioning the
above packages as something that was current as-of-writing, is better?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: required packages documentation
2001-12-31 3:24 ` Simon Josefsson
@ 2001-12-31 3:32 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2001-12-31 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
> The Gnus XEmacs package Makefile says
>
> REQUIRES = gnus w3 mh-e mailcrypt rmail eterm mail-lib xemacs-base
> fsf-compat
>
> but I'm not sure if it is reliable to document this set of packages,
> they might change over time? Maybe documenting that "whatever
> packages the Gnus XEmacs package requires", possibly mentioning the
> above packages as something that was current as-of-writing, is better?
Yup. I'll do that.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-31 3:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-14 20:34 required packages documentation NAGY Andras
2001-12-31 3:16 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-12-31 3:24 ` Simon Josefsson
2001-12-31 3:32 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).