Re: spam*.el and ifile-gnus.el?

[Clemens Fischer <ino@despammed.com>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, kohrs@castify.net wrote:
>> Second, would ifile make sense on headers only, for spam decisions ?
>
> I think so, I am able to visually distinguish spam messages in about
> 95% of the cases based on the subject: header alone, in the summary
> buffer.  Spam messages are generally about things you don't care about :)

letting ifile judge on the subject line alone if it usually gets
messages in toto may give wrong results.  or maybe if it is really
only the subject line, then you'll miss "only" the porn spams saying
"hello, darling" or "back from vacation".  chances rise if you feed
all of the headers, but full accuracy comes from full data, as always.

clemens