Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Williamson <rwilli...@gmail.com>
To: Ulrik Buchholtz <ulrikbu...@gmail.com>
Cc: Homotopy Type Theory <HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com>,
	matthie...@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Re: Is [Equiv Type_i Type_i] contractible?
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:44:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161027194440.GA826@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ced56b8-66bb-4f7f-996e-bbbb84c227ab@googlegroups.com>

I think the earliest proof of some version of Grothendieck's
hypothèse inspiratrice is in the following paper of Cisinki.

http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/20/17/20-17abs.html

It is my belief that Grothendieck's original formulation, which
was for the homotopy category itself (as opposed to a lifting of
it), is independent of ZFC. A proof of this would be fascinating.
I have occasionally speculated about trying to use HoTT to give
such an independence proof. Vladimir's comment suggests that one
direction of this is already done.

Best wishes,
Richard

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:12:50AM -0700, Ulrik Buchholtz wrote:
> This is (related to) Grothendieck's “inspiring assumption” of Pursuing
> Stacks section 28.
>
> I only know of the treatment by Barwick and Schommer-Pries in On the
> Unicity of the Homotopy Theory of Higher Categories:
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.0040
>
> Theorem 8.12 for n=0 says that the Kan complex of homotopy theories of
> (infinity,0)-categories is contractible. Of course this depends on their
> axiomatization, Definition 6.8. Perhaps some ideas can be adapted.
>
> Cheers,
> Ulrik
>
> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 5:15:45 PM UTC+2, Matthieu Sozeau wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> >   we've been stuck with N. Tabareau and his student Théo Winterhalter on
> > the above question. Is it the case that all equivalences between a universe
> > and itself are equivalent to the identity? We can't seem to prove (or
> > disprove) this from univalence alone, and even additional parametricity
> > assumptions do not seem to help. Did we miss a counterexample? Did anyone
> > investigate this or can produce a proof as an easy corollary? What is the
> > situation in, e.g. the simplicial model?
> >
> > -- Matthieu
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-27 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-27 15:15 Matthieu Sozeau
2016-10-27 15:19 ` [HoTT] " Martin Escardo
2016-10-27 15:38   ` Martin Escardo
2016-10-27 17:09     ` Nicolai Kraus
2016-10-27 17:08 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2016-10-27 17:12 ` Ulrik Buchholtz
2016-10-27 19:44   ` Richard Williamson [this message]
2016-10-27 20:38     ` [HoTT] " Ulrik Buchholtz
2016-10-30 20:56       ` Richard Williamson
2016-10-31 10:00         ` Eric Finster
2016-10-31 13:07           ` MLTT with proof-relevant judgmental equality? Neel Krishnaswami
2016-10-31 21:43             ` [HoTT] " Andrej Bauer
2016-10-31 22:01               ` Neel Krishnaswami
2016-10-27 20:18 ` Is [Equiv Type_i Type_i] contractible? nicolas tabareau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161027194440.GA826@richard \
    --to="rwilli..."@gmail.com \
    --cc="HomotopyT..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="matthie..."@inria.fr \
    --cc="ulrikbu..."@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).