Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Shulman <shu...@sandiego.edu>
To: Thomas Streicher <stre...@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: Ambrus Kaposi <kaposi...@gmail.com>,
	 Altenkirch Thorsten <Thorsten....@nottingham.ac.uk>,
	 "HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com" <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Where is the problem with initiality?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 04:47:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOvivQzH2q8Y=p8pcK4R1sqe1SnCCN=amS=B99dMYZxZy+qL8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180526092138.GA7067@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>

Thomas, are you saying that the hard part is proving that the syntax
of type theory is a CwF?  I always thought that was perfectly obvious
and the hard part was interpreting the syntax into some other CwF.

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 2:21 AM, Thomas Streicher
<stre...@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> Triggered by your mails I have tried to recall what I think has to
> be shown for verifying the initiality conjecture.
> Given a type theory with its catgeorical semantics we can construct 2
> models M_a and M_s where M_a is the initial model of the respective
> essentially algebraic theory and M_s is the Lindenbaum-Tarski model
> obtained by factoring syntax modulo provable (judgemental) equality.
> Then we have homomorphism h : M_a -> M_s (by initiality) and h' : M_s
> -> M_a (essential the interpretation function for the theory in M_a).
> Trivially h' \circ h is the identity. For showing that h \circ h' is
> the identity one essentailly shows that interpreting syntax in M_a and
> translating the result back to syntax with variables is the identity.
>
> This last step should be a straightforward induction over syntax.
> Thus the main task is to show that M_s is actually a model. This
> latter task I performed for CoC in my old Thesis. This is fairly
> tedious when performed in detail.
>
> When I wrote my Thesis I didn't think about M_a at all. Instead I used
> the obvious fact that interpreting syntax in M_s just amounts to
> taking equivalence classes modulo provable equivalence. This suffices
> for obtaining the completeness theorem I wanted to have. That M_s is
> initial is then sort of obvious since M_s is term generated and
> interpretation of syntax gives a morphism from M_s to any other model.
>
> So summing up the key is to show that the Lindenbaum-Tarksi construction
> gives rise to a model.
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-26 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22  5:46 Michael Shulman
2018-05-22 16:47 ` Ambrus Kaposi
2018-05-23 16:26 ` [HoTT] " Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-24  5:52   ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-24  8:11     ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-24  9:53       ` Ambrus Kaposi
2018-05-24 17:26         ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-26  9:21           ` Thomas Streicher
2018-05-26 11:47             ` Michael Shulman [this message]
2018-05-26 16:47               ` stre...
2018-05-27  5:14                 ` Bas Spitters
2018-05-28 22:39 ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-29  9:15   ` [HoTT] " Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-29 15:15     ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-30  9:33       ` Thomas Streicher
2018-05-30  9:37         ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-30 10:10           ` Thomas Streicher
2018-05-30 12:08             ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-30 13:40               ` Thomas Streicher
2018-05-30 14:38                 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-30 10:53           ` Alexander Kurz
2018-05-30 12:05             ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-30 19:07               ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-31 10:06                 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-31 11:05                   ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-31 19:02                     ` Alexander Kurz
2018-06-01  9:55                       ` Martin Escardo
2018-06-01 17:07                       ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-06-01 17:43                         ` Eric Finster
2018-06-01 19:55                           ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-06-01 20:59                             ` András Kovács
2018-06-01 21:06                               ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-06-01 21:23                                 ` Michael Shulman
2018-06-01 21:53                                   ` Eric Finster
2018-06-01 22:09                                     ` Michael Shulman
2018-06-02 15:06                                       ` Eric Finster
2018-06-05 20:04                                         ` Michael Shulman
2018-06-02  5:13                                 ` Thomas Streicher
2018-06-01 21:52                               ` Jasper Hugunin
2018-06-01 22:00                                 ` Eric Finster
2018-06-01 21:27                           ` Matt Oliveri
2018-06-02  5:21                             ` Ambrus Kaposi
2018-06-02  6:01                               ` Thomas Streicher
2018-06-02 14:35                           ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-05-30 13:30             ` Jon Sterling
2018-06-05  7:52             ` Andrej Bauer
2018-06-05  8:37               ` David Roberts
2018-06-05  9:46                 ` Gabriel Scherer
2018-06-05 22:19                 ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-06-05 22:54                   ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-06-05 22:12               ` Richard Williamson
2018-06-06 15:05                 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-06-06 19:25                   ` Richard Williamson
2018-05-29 14:00   ` Jon Sterling
2018-05-30 22:35     ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-31 10:48       ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-05-31 11:09         ` Michael Shulman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOvivQzH2q8Y=p8pcK4R1sqe1SnCCN=amS=B99dMYZxZy+qL8w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to="shu..."@sandiego.edu \
    --cc="Thorsten...."@nottingham.ac.uk \
    --cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="kaposi..."@gmail.com \
    --cc="stre..."@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).