Re: roff.c question

[Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@usta.de>]

Hi Kristaps,

>> I'll probably split exit_status into two variables:
>> First, file_status will be initialized to MANDOCERR_OK for each
>> file, and that's the one mmsg will write to.
>> Then, at the end of each file, the contents must be moved to
>> exit_status, in case it's more severe than what is already there.

That was so easy that i have just put it in.

> Another question---I'm about to check in roff.c as fully in sync
> after running some more tests---I notice that `de1' has been removed
> from the switch statement at roff.c:549.  I understand this is
> because `de1' is renamed at roff.c:636.

Exactly.

> If this is the case, can you document this process a bit more?

I guess i should do that when touching roff.c the next time, which
might happen soon...

> There's also an infinite loop somewhere in these new roff.c changes
> that's causing the NetBSD manuals to blow up...

... given that i'm now starting to look into that one.

Yours,
  Ingo
--
 To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv