From: Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@bsd.lv>
To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv
Subject: Are Fo/Fc really block partial explicit?
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:44:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5A1C1E.3080609@bsd.lv> (raw)
Hi,
I'm working on examples for the Macros section of the mdoc book (in case
you're not online much, <http://manpages.bsd.lv>). When it came to an
block partial explicit example, I of course opted for Fo/Fc because I'd
used it in prior examples.
But it made me think: is this really properly categorised? It does have
the characteristics of block full explicit: head and body are different,
closed by explicit macro, and is block. ALL of the other block partial
explicits have no head (but Eo/Ec, which is an alien) by definition.
Thoughts? Recategorise?
Kristaps
--
To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv
reply other threads:[~2011-08-28 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5A1C1E.3080609@bsd.lv \
--to=kristaps@bsd.lv \
--cc=tech@mdocml.bsd.lv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).