Re: [PATCH v2] remove riscv64 user_regs_struct

[Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>]

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:47:29PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> user_regs_struct removal fixes possible conflict with the kernel
> definition of the same struct in asm/ptrace.h. glibc does not define
> user_regs_struct for riscv either.
> ---
> v2: Remove user_regs_struct entirely following feedback from Rich and
> 	Szabolcs
> ---
>  arch/riscv64/bits/user.h | 35 -----------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
> index bd0f0fc7027f..d2e383b24e53 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
> @@ -1,38 +1,3 @@
> -struct user_regs_struct {
> -	unsigned long pc;
> -	unsigned long ra;
> -	unsigned long sp;
> -	unsigned long gp;
> -	unsigned long tp;
> -	unsigned long t0;
> -	unsigned long t1;
> -	unsigned long t2;
> -	unsigned long s0;
> -	unsigned long s1;
> -	unsigned long a0;
> -	unsigned long a1;
> -	unsigned long a2;
> -	unsigned long a3;
> -	unsigned long a4;
> -	unsigned long a5;
> -	unsigned long a6;
> -	unsigned long a7;
> -	unsigned long s2;
> -	unsigned long s3;
> -	unsigned long s4;
> -	unsigned long s5;
> -	unsigned long s6;
> -	unsigned long s7;
> -	unsigned long s8;
> -	unsigned long s9;
> -	unsigned long s10;
> -	unsigned long s11;
> -	unsigned long t3;
> -	unsigned long t4;
> -	unsigned long t5;
> -	unsigned long t6;
> -};
> -
>  struct user_fpregs_struct {
>  	double f[32];
>  	unsigned int fcsr;
> -- 
> 2.20.1

It's not just that struct but the whole file. I've got the removal
already committed here though, pending push with a queue of stuff from
the list. Thanks.

Rich