Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Gregor Richards]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1149 bytes --]

Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2012Q2 on 
musl 0.9.4, with patches from 
http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 1af4ab8efd9d.

Attempted:      10657
Deps failed:    3994
Build tried:    6663
Build failed:   1232
Tests failed:   285
Success:        5146 (77.2325%)

Breakdown: 
https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-970883629786-musl-0.9.4-breakdown.txt 
or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results
Archive: 
https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-970883629786-musl-0.9.4.tar.gz?attredirects=0&d=1


Notes:

In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means 
tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure.

Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build).

If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them on 
the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker: 
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues .

As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available 
via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches .

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2646 bytes --]

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Gregor Richards]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2610 bytes --]

On 08/26/2012 09:49 AM, Gregor Richards wrote:
> Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2012Q2 on 
> musl 0.9.4, with patches from 
> http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 1af4ab8efd9d.
>
> Attempted:      10657
> Deps failed:    3994
> Build tried:    6663
> Build failed:   1232
> Tests failed:   285
> Success:        5146 (77.2325%)
>
> Breakdown: 
> https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-970883629786-musl-0.9.4-breakdown.txt 
> or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results
> Archive: 
> https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-970883629786-musl-0.9.4.tar.gz?attredirects=0&d=1
>
>
> Notes:
>
> In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means 
> tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure.
>
> Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build).
>
> If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them 
> on the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker: 
> https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues .
>
> As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available 
> via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches .
>
> With valediction,
>  - Gregor Richards
>

The top 20 most wanted dependencies were:
     890 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/lang/ruby193-base
     738 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/x11/fltk
     362 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/math/pari
     360 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/math/p5-Math-Pari
     358 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/x11/qt3-libs
     357 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/security/p5-Crypt-Primes
     356 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/security/p5-Crypt-RSA
     355 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/security/p5-Crypt-OpenPGP
     354 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/security/p5-Module-Signature
     352 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/devel/p5-PAR-Dist
     350 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/devel/p5-Module-Install
     346 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/x11/qt4-libs
     260 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/lang/php53
     248 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/devel/libf2c
     208 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/devel/heirloom-libcommon
     151 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/x11/qt4-tools
     150 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/devel/p5-Task-Weaken
     142 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/lang/g95
     140 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/audio/libcanberra
     134 bmake: stopped in /var/pkgsrc/net/libpcap

I have since fixed lang/ruby193-base, x11/fltk, math/pari and 
lang/php53. I'm actually doing another run since that affected so many 
builds.

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5006 bytes --]

Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Gregor Richards]

Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2012Q2 on 
musl 0.9.3, with patches from 
http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 6b7af27ab794.

Attempted:      10659
Deps failed:    4556
Build tried:    6103
Build failed:   1132
Tests failed:   251
Success:        4720 (77.339%)

Breakdown: 
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-6b7af27ab794-musl-0.9.3-breakdown.txt 
or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results
Archive: 
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-6b7af27ab794-musl-0.9.3.tar.gz


Notes:

In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means 
tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure.

There were a couple regressions in the upgrade to 2012Q2 that I haven't 
fixed yet.

Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). There's 
some miscommunication between Ruby and musl's localtime that I'm yet to 
figure out, and it causes the build to die in the docs stage. I'm told 
it works elsewhere. PHP has patches I have not yet integrated. SDL 
actually works, but I had a misconfiguration on the test machine (I 
neglected to disable nas), so it failed due to imaginary dependencies.

If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them on 
the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker: 
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues .

As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available 
via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches .

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[idunham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 970 bytes --]

>
>>>> Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc
...

>>> I can send patches for libowfat, if you want. (I know it's not great
>>> code, but I wanted dietsniff, so I patched both...)
>> I certainly won't argue.
See attached. Well, now that I look at it, it's
+CFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE
...
>>> I may look into editors/ted and wm/icewm, since icewm is one of my
>>> favorite wms and Ted is the wordprocessor I usually use.
> I still have to get libpcre so it will build, but looking at make -i, Ted
> _seems_ to be simply wanting _XOPEN_SOURCE (or _GNU_SOURCE or
> _BSD_SOURCE), so it gets the M_* defines in math.h. (the only files that
> didn't build were the one that #include'd pcre.h, and a few that errored
> on M_PI and M_SQRT1_2
Builds and runs with _XOPEN_SOURCE (I tested the Motif UI, FYI).

Also FYI: if you apply the standard gcc patches/changes to gcc-core-3.4.6,
then untar gcc-g77-3.4.6 over that, g77 will build with no extra patches
needed.
 Thanks,
Isaac Dunham

[-- Attachment #2: lowfat.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 525 bytes --]

--- libowfat-0.28/GNUmakefile
+++ libowfat-0.28-musl/GNUmakefile
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 # CFLAGS += -fstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-aliasing=2
 
 CFLAGS += -D_REENTRANT
+CFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE
 
 # startrip
 ifneq ($(DEBUG),)
--- libowfat-0.28/Makefile
+++ libowfat-0.28-musl/Makefile
@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@
 
 # CFLAGS += -fstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-aliasing=2
 
-CFLAGS += -D_REENTRANT
+CFLAGS += -D_REENTRANT 
+CFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE
 
 array_allocate.o: array/array_allocate.c safemult.h uint16.h uint32.h \
   uint64.h array.h byte.h

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Gregor Richards]

On 07/19/2012 06:35 PM, idunham@lavabit.com wrote:
>> If you just want the pkgsrc patches, you can
>> either use snowflake/pkgsrc-patches (broken down by package) or
>> snowflake/core/patches/pkgsrc-musl.diff (all in one). Use pkgsrc 2012Q1
>> for easiest patching, I haven't updated to Q2 yet. I intend to right
>> about now, since this build is over.
>>
>> (To listeners-in, Snowflake is http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/snowflake )
> Ah yes...I still haven't bothered setting up Python or Mercurial...and I'd
> been hoping to avoid anything other than git as long as possible ;).
>
> Thanks,
> Isaac Dunham
>
>
>
It's mirrored to git, as are all of my projects: 
https://github.com/GregorR/snowflake

(Due to mirroring imperfection you'd need to also check out musl-cross 
in order to actually /build/ snowflake, but if you just want the 
patches, it's fine)

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[idunham]

>>> Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc
>>> Most valuable dependencies: http://sprunge.us/CcBV
>> IIRC the wiki's not up right now, but this seems like something that
>> would
>> be useful to post there.
> I was pushing on the wiki for exactly this reason ;)
>>> Some notes:
>>> Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). I haven't
>>> investigated, but it might be pkgsrc-specific. I'm told it works
>>> elsewhere. PHP and SDL have patches I have not yet integrated.
>> I can send patches for libowfat, if you want. (I know it's not great
>> code, but I wanted dietsniff, so I patched both...)
> I certainly won't argue.
>> I may look into editors/ted and wm/icewm, since icewm is one of my
>> favorite wms and Ted is the wordprocessor I usually use.
I still have to get libpcre so it will build, but looking at make -i, Ted
_seems_ to be simply wanting _XOPEN_SOURCE (or _GNU_SOURCE or
_BSD_SOURCE), so it gets the M_* defines in math.h. (the only files that
didn't build were the one that #include'd pcre.h, and a few that errored
on M_PI and M_SQRT1_2

(most of you probably know this, but anyhow,
make -i 2>&1 |tee $LOGFILE
 (I use busybox tee), then grep error: $LOGFILE, helps find where the
problems are)
...
> If you just want the pkgsrc patches, you can
> either use snowflake/pkgsrc-patches (broken down by package) or
> snowflake/core/patches/pkgsrc-musl.diff (all in one). Use pkgsrc 2012Q1
> for easiest patching, I haven't updated to Q2 yet. I intend to right
> about now, since this build is over.
>
> (To listeners-in, Snowflake is http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/snowflake )

Ah yes...I still haven't bothered setting up Python or Mercurial...and I'd
been hoping to avoid anything other than git as long as possible ;).

Thanks,
Isaac Dunham

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Kurt H Maier]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:30:37PM -0400, Gregor Richards wrote:
> Here are the results from my latest build of pkgsrc on musl 0.9.2.
> 

This is fantastic work.  Thanks for doing this.

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Gregor Richards]

On 07/19/2012 12:28 AM, idunham@lavabit.com wrote:
>> Here are the results from my latest build of pkgsrc on musl 0.9.2
> I presume you know there are a couple small compatability fixes since then?
> That probably won't make a *major* difference, though.
Yes, but my life's much simpler if I can just say a version, rather than 
"with git revision crazyhexstringthatmeansnothing"
>
>> Attempted:    10593
>> Deps failed:    4143
>> Build tried:    6450
>> Build failed:    1159
>> Tests failed:    302
>> Success:    4989 (77.3488%)
> So nearly half of pkgsrc builds, as it stands.
Roughly. Once I get Ruby I expect that to increase a fair bit, to over half.
>
>> Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc
>> Most valuable dependencies: http://sprunge.us/CcBV
> IIRC the wiki's not up right now, but this seems like something that would
> be useful to post there.
I was pushing on the wiki for exactly this reason ;)
>> Some notes:
>> Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). I haven't
>> investigated, but it might be pkgsrc-specific. I'm told it works
>> elsewhere. PHP and SDL have patches I have not yet integrated.
> I can send patches for libowfat, if you want. (I know it's not great code,
> but I wanted dietsniff, so I patched both...)
I certainly won't argue.
> I may look into editors/ted and wm/icewm, since icewm is one of my
> favorite wms and Ted is the wordprocessor I usually use.
>
> Also, where is your version of pkgsrc available? Is this in with the
> snowflake repository, or elsewhere?
It's part of Snowflake. If you just want the pkgsrc patches, you can 
either use snowflake/pkgsrc-patches (broken down by package) or 
snowflake/core/patches/pkgsrc-musl.diff (all in one). Use pkgsrc 2012Q1 
for easiest patching, I haven't updated to Q2 yet. I intend to right 
about now, since this build is over.

(To listeners-in, Snowflake is http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/snowflake )

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[idunham]

> Here are the results from my latest build of pkgsrc on musl 0.9.2

I presume you know there are a couple small compatability fixes since then?
That probably won't make a *major* difference, though.

> Attempted:    10593
> Deps failed:    4143
> Build tried:    6450
> Build failed:    1159
> Tests failed:    302
> Success:    4989 (77.3488%)
So nearly half of pkgsrc builds, as it stands.

> Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc
> Most valuable dependencies: http://sprunge.us/CcBV

IIRC the wiki's not up right now, but this seems like something that would
be useful to post there.
> Some notes:
> Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). I haven't
> investigated, but it might be pkgsrc-specific. I'm told it works
> elsewhere. PHP and SDL have patches I have not yet integrated.

I can send patches for libowfat, if you want. (I know it's not great code,
but I wanted dietsniff, so I patched both...)
I may look into editors/ted and wm/icewm, since icewm is one of my
favorite wms and Ted is the wordprocessor I usually use.

Also, where is your version of pkgsrc available? Is this in with the
snowflake repository, or elsewhere?

Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Rich Felker]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:30:37PM -0400, Gregor Richards wrote:
> Here are the results from my latest build of pkgsrc on musl 0.9.2.
> 
> Attempted:    10593
> Deps failed:    4143
> Build tried:    6450
> Build failed:    1159
> Tests failed:    302
> Success:    4989 (77.3488%)
> 
> Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc
> Most valuable dependencies: http://sprunge.us/CcBV

Are these links intended to be permanent, indexable by wayback
machine, etc.? If not, it would be helpful to actually send the
results to the list or put it somewhere that is intended to survive
long-term.

Rich

Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Gregor Richards]

Here are the results from my latest build of pkgsrc on musl 0.9.2.

Attempted:    10593
Deps failed:    4143
Build tried:    6450
Build failed:    1159
Tests failed:    302
Success:    4989 (77.3488%)

Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc
Most valuable dependencies: http://sprunge.us/CcBV

Some notes:
Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). I haven't 
investigated, but it might be pkgsrc-specific. I'm told it works 
elsewhere. PHP and SDL have patches I have not yet integrated. In the 
breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means tests. 
Blank is success, 'X' is failure.

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards