* [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken?
@ 2023-04-15 17:27 Jim via ntg-context
2023-04-15 17:49 ` [NTG-context] https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Enumerations problem Jim via ntg-context
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-15 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context; +Cc: Jim
In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the
following example:
%------------------------------------------------------------------------
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
\startitemize
\item One
\stopitemize
This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}.
\startitemize
\item Two
\stopitemize
This paragraph should not be indented.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tragically, the paragraph which claims it should be indented is not, in
both my test and the wiki page itself.
Is this a documentation bug, a ConTeXt bug, or something else yet?
Cheers.
Jim
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [NTG-context] https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Enumerations problem 2023-04-15 17:27 [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-15 17:49 ` Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-16 12:28 ` [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Carlos via ntg-context 2023-04-16 16:35 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-15 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context; +Cc: Jim In https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Enumerations there is this example: %---------------------------------------------------------------- \setupwhitespace[big] \definesymbol[1][$\triangleright$] \startcolumns {\bf joinedup:} \par before \startitemize[joinedup] \item test \item test \stopitemize after \par {\bf nowhite:} \par before \startitemize[nowhite] \item test \item test \stopitemize after \par {\bf joinedup,nowhite:} \par before \startitemize[joinedup,nowhite] \item test \item test \stopitemize after \column {\bf joinedup,nowhite,before:} \par before \startitemize[joinedup,nowhite,before] \item test \item test \stopitemize after \par {\bf joinedup,nowhite,after:} \par before \startitemize[joinedup,nowhite,after] \item test \item test \stopitemize after \stopcolumns %---------------------------------------------------------------- In my test "joinedup" leaves whitespace before the first list item and after the last, but in the sample output there is no space. While someone (?) is thinking about that, my (extremely rudimentary!) tests also indicate that there is no need to use "joinedup" when you use "nowhite". Is this indeed the case (in which case the wiki page could use an edit) or are there case where both "joinedup" and "nowhite" are needed together (in which case the wiki page could stand a little more information). Thanks. Jim ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-15 17:27 [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-15 17:49 ` [NTG-context] https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Enumerations problem Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 12:28 ` Carlos via ntg-context 2023-04-16 16:24 ` Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-16 16:35 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Carlos via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context; +Cc: Carlos On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Jim via ntg-context wrote: > In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the > following example: > > %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > \setupindenting[medium,yes] > \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] > > \startitemize > \item One > \stopitemize > > This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. > > \startitemize > \item Two > \stopitemize > This paragraph should not be indented. > > %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Tragically, the paragraph which claims it should be indented is not, in > both my test and the wiki page itself. > > Is this a documentation bug, a ConTeXt bug, or something else yet? I don't know. Why would it be a documentation bug if it clearly says it should be indented only after the blank line, unless \indent was omitted on purpose while trying to make it look as if the blank line would have any effect after all. Makes no sense. \setupindenting[medium,yes] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] \starttext \startitemize \item One \stopitemize\indent%blank line This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. \startitemize \item Two \stopitemize \noindent{\dorecurse{10}{\indent This paragraph should not be indented.}} \stoptext > > Cheers. > > Jim > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : https://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > -- 101 USES FOR A DEAD MICROPROCESSOR (1) Scarecrow for centipedes (2) Dead cat brush (3) Hair barrettes (4) Cleats (5) Self-piercing earrings (6) Fungus trellis (7) False eyelashes (8) Prosthetic dog claws . . . (99) Window garden harrow (pulled behind Tonka tractors) (100) Killer velcro (101) Currency ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-16 12:28 ` [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Carlos via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 16:24 ` Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-19 12:23 ` Carlos via ntg-context 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: Jim, Carlos On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 08:28 (-0400), Carlos via ntg-context wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Jim via ntg-context wrote: >> In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the >> following example: >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> \setupindenting[medium,yes] >> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] >> \startitemize >> \item One >> \stopitemize >> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. >> \startitemize >> \item Two >> \stopitemize >> This paragraph should not be indented. >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Tragically, the paragraph which claims it should be indented is not, in >> both my test and the wiki page itself. >> Is this a documentation bug, a ConTeXt bug, or something else yet? > I don't know. OK, but I wasn't asking you specifically. > Why would it be a documentation bug if it clearly says it should be > indented only after the blank line, unless \indent was omitted on purpose > while trying to make it look as if the blank line would have any effect > after all. Makes no sense. Have you never run into a documentation bug before? Happy you! I see two possibly reasons for a documentation bug here (there might be more): (1) The documentation was incorrect at time of writing. Humans have been known to make mistakes. (2) The semantics of \setupitemize might have changed since the documentation was written, and the change has not yet been reflected in this particular piece of documentation. This would not be the first time that documentation changes lagged behind code changes. The point is, there is a disconnect between the documentation says will happen and what actually happens. I don't know which is wrong, and thus my question. I hope that sooner or later someone who can definitively comment on the disconnect will speak up. > \setupindenting[medium,yes] > \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] > \starttext > \startitemize > \item One > \stopitemize\indent%blank line > This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. > \startitemize > \item Two > \stopitemize > \noindent{\dorecurse{10}{\indent This paragraph should not be indented.}} > \stoptext ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-16 16:24 ` Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-19 12:23 ` Carlos via ntg-context 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Carlos via ntg-context @ 2023-04-19 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context; +Cc: Carlos On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 01:24:08PM -0300, Jim via ntg-context wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 08:28 (-0400), Carlos via ntg-context wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Jim via ntg-context wrote: > >> In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the > >> following example: > > >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> \setupindenting[medium,yes] > >> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] > > >> \startitemize > >> \item One > >> \stopitemize > > >> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. > > >> \startitemize > >> \item Two > >> \stopitemize > >> This paragraph should not be indented. > > >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> Tragically, the paragraph which claims it should be indented is not, in > >> both my test and the wiki page itself. > > >> Is this a documentation bug, a ConTeXt bug, or something else yet? > > > I don't know. > > OK, but I wasn't asking you specifically. Thnt's more than obvious, asshole. Or passive-aggressive asshole. You're posting it on the mailing list for the users, devs, and end-users alike to test it out as required and comment or say whatever they want. > > > Why would it be a documentation bug if it clearly says it should be > > indented only after the blank line, unless \indent was omitted on purpose > > while trying to make it look as if the blank line would have any effect > > after all. Makes no sense. > > Have you never run into a documentation bug before? Happy you! > > I see two possibly reasons for a documentation bug here (there might be more): > (1) The documentation was incorrect at time of writing. Humans have been > known to make mistakes. > (2) The semantics of \setupitemize might have changed since the documentation > was written, and the change has not yet been reflected in this > particular piece of documentation. > This would not be the first time that documentation changes lagged > behind code changes. > Neither one. > The point is, there is a disconnect between the documentation says will > happen and what actually happens. I don't know which is wrong, and thus my > question. I hope that sooner or later someone who can definitively comment > on the disconnect will speak up. I agree. :) > > > \setupindenting[medium,yes] > > \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] > > > \starttext > > \startitemize > > \item One > > \stopitemize\indent%blank line > > > This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. > > > \startitemize > > \item Two > > \stopitemize > > > \noindent{\dorecurse{10}{\indent This paragraph should not be indented.}} > > \stoptext > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : https://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > -- To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-15 17:27 [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-15 17:49 ` [NTG-context] https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Enumerations problem Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-16 12:28 ` [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Carlos via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 16:35 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2023-04-16 17:23 ` Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-17 5:06 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim via ntg-context; +Cc: Aditya Mahajan On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote: > In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the > following example: > > %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > \setupindenting[medium,yes] > \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] > > \startitemize > \item One > \stopitemize > > This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. > > \startitemize > \item Two > \stopitemize > This paragraph should not be indented. > > %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Tragically, the paragraph which claims it should be indented is not, in > both my test and the wiki page itself. > > Is this a documentation bug, a ConTeXt bug, or something else yet? Works in mkiv but appears to be a bug in lmtx. I haven't debugged what is going wrong. Aditya (who wrote bulk of that wiki page) ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-16 16:35 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 17:23 ` Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-17 5:06 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-16 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: Jim On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 12:35 (-0400), Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote: >> In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the >> following example: >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> \setupindenting[medium,yes] >> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] >> \startitemize >> \item One >> \stopitemize >> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. >> \startitemize >> \item Two >> \stopitemize >> This paragraph should not be indented. >> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Tragically, the paragraph which claims it should be indented is not, in >> both my test and the wiki page itself. >> Is this a documentation bug, a ConTeXt bug, or something else yet? > Works in mkiv but appears to be a bug in lmtx. I haven't debugged what is > going wrong. > Aditya (who wrote bulk of that wiki page) Thanks very much for getting back. And for your wiki contributions. Jim ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-16 16:35 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2023-04-16 17:23 ` Jim via ntg-context @ 2023-04-17 5:06 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2023-04-17 17:04 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context @ 2023-04-17 5:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context; +Cc: Aditya Mahajan On Sun, 16 Apr 2023, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote: > > > %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > \setupindenting[medium,yes] > > \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] > > > > \startitemize > > \item One > > \stopitemize > > > > This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. > > > > \startitemize > > \item Two > > \stopitemize > > This paragraph should not be indented. > > > > %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Works in mkiv but appears to be a bug in lmtx. I haven't debugged what is going wrong. `indentnext=auto` doesn't appear to work for any environment. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-17 5:06 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context @ 2023-04-17 17:04 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context 2023-04-18 13:48 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen via ntg-context @ 2023-04-17 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context; +Cc: Hans Hagen On 4/17/2023 7:06 AM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2023, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote: >> >>> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> \setupindenting[medium,yes] >>> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] >>> >>> \startitemize >>> \item One >>> \stopitemize >>> >>> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after \type{\stopitemize}. >>> >>> \startitemize >>> \item Two >>> \stopitemize >>> This paragraph should not be indented. >>> >>> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Works in mkiv but appears to be a bug in lmtx. I haven't debugged what is going wrong. > > `indentnext=auto` doesn't appear to work for any environment. can you test with this patch \permanent\protected\protected\def\spac_indentation_check_next_indentation {\global\enforced\let\dorechecknextindentation\relax \begingroup \autoparagraphmode\zerocount \doifelsenextchar\par\endgroup{\endgroup\spac_indentation_variant_no}} % messy check as next is seldom \par ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-17 17:04 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context @ 2023-04-18 13:48 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2023-04-18 14:56 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context @ 2023-04-18 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans Hagen via ntg-context; +Cc: Aditya Mahajan On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > On 4/17/2023 7:06 AM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Apr 2023, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote: > >> > >>> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > >>> \setupindenting[medium,yes] > >>> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] > >>> > >>> \startitemize > >>> \item One > >>> \stopitemize > >>> > >>> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after > >>> \type{\stopitemize}. > >>> > >>> \startitemize > >>> \item Two > >>> \stopitemize > >>> This paragraph should not be indented. > >>> > >>> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Works in mkiv but appears to be a bug in lmtx. I haven't debugged what is > >> going wrong. > > > > `indentnext=auto` doesn't appear to work for any environment. > can you test with this patch This works on with the 3-4 test examples that I had but ... > \permanent\protected\protected\def\spac_indentation_check_next_indentation ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Is that a typo (double \protected)? I tested with a single \protected and that also works. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? 2023-04-18 13:48 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context @ 2023-04-18 14:56 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen via ntg-context @ 2023-04-18 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context; +Cc: Hans Hagen On 4/18/2023 3:48 PM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > >> On 4/17/2023 7:06 AM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2023, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote: >>>> >>>>> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> \setupindenting[medium,yes] >>>>> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] >>>>> >>>>> \startitemize >>>>> \item One >>>>> \stopitemize >>>>> >>>>> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after >>>>> \type{\stopitemize}. >>>>> >>>>> \startitemize >>>>> \item Two >>>>> \stopitemize >>>>> This paragraph should not be indented. >>>>> >>>>> %------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Works in mkiv but appears to be a bug in lmtx. I haven't debugged what is >>>> going wrong. >>> >>> `indentnext=auto` doesn't appear to work for any environment. >> can you test with this patch > > This works on with the 3-4 test examples that I had but ... > >> \permanent\protected\protected\def\spac_indentation_check_next_indentation > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Is that a typo (double \protected)? I tested with a single \protected and that also works. it's a typo .. maybe i should add (for completeness) \protected\unprotected\protected (\permanent only kicks in when you are on overload protection mode, which I'm always in here) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-19 12:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-04-15 17:27 [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-15 17:49 ` [NTG-context] https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Enumerations problem Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-16 12:28 ` [NTG-context] \setupitemize[indentnext=auto] broken? Carlos via ntg-context 2023-04-16 16:24 ` Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-19 12:23 ` Carlos via ntg-context 2023-04-16 16:35 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2023-04-16 17:23 ` Jim via ntg-context 2023-04-17 5:06 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2023-04-17 17:04 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context 2023-04-18 13:48 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context 2023-04-18 14:56 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).