From: Jeff <sysinit@yandex.com>
To: superstition <supervision@list.skarnet.org>
Subject: Re: runit SIGPWR support
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:31:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6637411582479111@sas8-ed615920eca2.qloud-c.yandex.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <emd2ede877-0fb0-4ebb-83b6-6771a8ce29db@elzian>
18.02.2020, 10:39, "Laurent Bercot" <ska-supervision@skarnet.org>:
> you're telling me that s6-svscan needs to understand SIGPWR in case the
> kernel wants to signal a power failure, you actually have a good point,
> and yes, I should implement SIGPWR support when this signal exists.
BTW:
have you ever used s6 as process #1 on any other platform than Linux ?
i bet you have not even tried to do so on any of the BSDs.
so why are you sticking to all this "POSIX-correctness" ?
adding a few lines of code to support a specific platform (linux or any other
unix) looks not like a big problem to me.
sticking to POSIX features in the default case is a good way to
achieve portability, that's right.
but avoiding platform specific advantages at all costs seems
pretty strange to me.
solaris, AIX and even OS X are all POSIX platforms, hence it
would be interesting to see if s6 will work out of the box there
(as process #1; handling SIGPWR may be a requirement here).
i am sure it will since unlike systemd it is portable.
those platforms cannot be "POSIX-correct" if not.
hence their kernels should be made "POSIX-correct" to run the
"POSIX-correct" s6 unchanged as process #1.
so who has to adapt, s6 or those kernels ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-23 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1beb6e35-d4be-60b8-fc52-af666c4fffe3@gmx.com>
2020-02-12 14:25 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-12 21:54 ` Colin Booth
2020-02-12 22:16 ` Dewayne Geraghty
2020-02-14 9:38 ` Jeff
2020-02-14 12:38 ` Steve Litt
2020-02-15 10:47 ` fungal-net
2020-02-14 10:08 ` Jeff
2020-02-14 10:46 ` Jeff
2020-02-14 12:29 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-14 12:45 ` Steve Litt
[not found] ` <CALZWFRLvtofWfP4kzxJ8_8_K3nzebPjCR-NsJ2MU22cSuaOLng@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20200214182241.15614126@mydesk.domain.cxm>
2020-02-17 19:46 ` Cameron Nemo
2020-02-23 16:11 ` Jeff
2020-02-17 14:39 ` Jeff
2020-02-14 14:02 ` Casper Ti. Vector
2020-02-17 14:45 ` Jeff
2020-02-17 14:50 ` Jeff
2020-02-14 13:15 ` Casper Ti. Vector
2020-02-14 13:39 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-14 13:57 ` Casper Ti. Vector
2020-02-14 14:06 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-14 14:25 ` Casper Ti. Vector
2020-02-14 18:30 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-17 10:00 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-17 15:13 ` Jeff
2020-02-18 9:39 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-20 20:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-02-23 16:51 ` Jeff
2020-02-23 23:53 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-24 6:31 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-24 10:23 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-24 13:00 ` Jeff
2020-02-24 19:53 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-24 13:12 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-24 15:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-02-26 8:07 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-28 6:39 ` Jan Braun
2020-02-28 9:45 ` Alex Suykov
2020-02-28 23:50 ` fungal-net
2020-02-29 13:44 ` Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
2020-02-29 18:20 ` Guillermo
2020-03-06 20:07 ` innerspacepilot
2020-03-06 20:09 ` innerspacepilot
2020-02-25 8:39 ` Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
2020-02-24 21:13 ` Guillermo
2020-02-24 22:25 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-24 22:49 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-24 23:08 ` Guillermo
2020-02-25 1:48 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-25 9:08 ` Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
2020-02-25 18:38 ` Guillermo
2020-03-16 12:49 ` Jeff
2020-03-16 17:13 ` Jeff
2020-02-24 23:03 ` Guillermo
2020-03-16 12:31 ` Jeff
2020-03-16 18:03 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-23 17:31 ` Jeff [this message]
2020-02-24 0:33 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-14 19:08 ` John W Higgins
2020-02-14 23:18 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-02-14 23:38 ` John W Higgins
2020-02-15 2:15 ` Laurent Bercot
2020-04-14 16:57 Maxim Vetsalo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-23 20:44 innerspacepilot
2020-01-31 4:39 ` Colin Booth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6637411582479111@sas8-ed615920eca2.qloud-c.yandex.net \
--to=sysinit@yandex.com \
--cc=supervision@list.skarnet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).