The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lm@mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy)
Subject: Favorite UNIX
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 17:36:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171002003628.GS16755@mcvoy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710012121.v91LLKHK004998@darkstar.fourwinds.com>

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 02:21:20PM -0700, Jon Steinhart wrote:
> Steve Mynott writes:
> > On 1 October 2017 at 18:51, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > Why was Solaris so much worse than SunOS?
> > 
> > Probably because it was so much more buggy on release and people were
> > more used to BSD and didn't like change and the fact that greedy Sun
> > had removed the compiler. Solaris 2.3 had core dumps from base
> > binaries everywhere where SunOS 4.1.3 seemed quite stable.
> 
> I think that the root cause is AT&T USL.  When UNIX went from research
> to "product" different people worked on it.  And those people seemed to
> lack the artistry, vision, and craftsmanship of the original developers.
> AT&T pushed their SVR4 crud hard onto the rest of the world.  Meanwhile,
> the folks at Berkeley produced code more in the original tradition
> possibly because of Ken taking a sabbatical year to teach there.  SunOS
> was the result of the pipeline between Berkeley and Sun.
> 
> Solaris was the result of Sun abandoning the Berkeley branch for the USL
> branch.

+1 couldn't have put it better.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	     lm at mcvoy.com             http://www.mcvoy.com/lm 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-01 17:51 Noel Chiappa
2017-10-01 18:05 ` Larry McVoy
2017-10-01 18:39   ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-02  8:44   ` jason-tuhs
2017-10-02 11:52     ` Kevin Bowling
2017-10-02 14:17     ` Warner Losh
2017-10-01 18:13 ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-01 20:15 ` Steve Mynott
2017-10-01 21:21   ` Jon Steinhart
2017-10-01 23:28     ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-02  0:36     ` Larry McVoy [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.1424.1506881102.3779.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2017-10-01 19:09 ` Will Senn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-09-29  2:58 [TUHS] " Kevin Bowling
2017-09-30 15:40 ` Michael Parson
2017-09-30 17:53   ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-09-30 18:34     ` Michael Parson
2017-09-30 18:45       ` Arthur Krewat
2017-10-01  0:36       ` Larry McVoy
2017-10-01  0:51         ` Dave Horsfall
2017-10-01  1:10           ` Larry McVoy
2017-10-01  1:13             ` Cory Smelosky
2017-10-01  3:43             ` Arthur Krewat
2017-10-01 14:07             ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-01  3:05       ` Michael Parson
2017-10-01  3:15         ` Kevin Bowling
     [not found]       ` <201710011513.v91FDSMB011831@freefriends.org>
2017-10-01 19:35         ` Michael Parson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171002003628.GS16755@mcvoy.com \
    --to=lm@mcvoy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).