From: Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
To: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>,
The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] First appearance of named pipes
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:37:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82dba3bc-a514-c5e9-eefd-615b08f58cbf@case.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.2003110715490.64345@aneurin.horsfall.org>
On 3/10/20 4:26 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
>> Yes, absolutely. Just like a pipe is a FIFO, a FIFO is just a pipe with a
>> name that appears in the file system.
>
> So they would still be subject to the same 8-block limit? I haven't delved
> into the finer points of named pipes as I rarely use them.
I believe that on Linux, at least, they have the same capacity limits
(64K), but you can modify that. I don't know about BSD.
> Related question: are they the same as Unix-domain sockets? Oddly enough I
> haven't used those much either.
They're similar, I guess ("I am but a shadowy reflection of you."). But I
haven't used unix domain sockets, either.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-06 22:44 Noel Chiappa
2020-03-07 12:17 ` Paul Ruizendaal
2020-03-07 13:29 ` Clem Cole
2020-03-07 16:39 ` Derek Fawcus
2020-03-08 2:36 ` Rob Pike
2020-03-08 2:47 ` Larry McVoy
2020-03-08 13:07 ` Ralph Corderoy
2020-03-08 13:25 ` arnold
2020-03-08 3:06 ` Dave Horsfall
2020-03-08 7:16 ` arnold
2020-03-08 15:13 ` [TUHS] sockets (was Re: First appearance of named pipes) Derek Fawcus
2020-03-09 23:22 ` Grant Taylor via TUHS
2020-03-09 23:44 ` Larry McVoy
2020-03-23 8:49 ` Peter Pentchev
2020-03-24 9:47 ` Derek Fawcus
2020-03-25 23:25 ` Grant Taylor via TUHS
2020-03-25 23:47 ` Richard Salz
2020-03-26 0:11 ` Grant Taylor via TUHS
2020-03-26 0:18 ` Richard Salz
2020-03-26 1:08 ` Grant Taylor via TUHS
2020-03-26 2:38 ` Dave Horsfall
2020-03-26 3:08 ` Rob Pike
2020-03-26 3:43 ` George Michaelson
2020-03-26 4:11 ` Grant Taylor via TUHS
2020-03-28 11:12 ` Peter Pentchev
2020-03-28 11:14 ` Peter Pentchev
2020-03-28 16:03 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2020-03-26 1:20 ` Tony Finch
2020-03-27 10:51 ` Derek Fawcus
2020-03-09 23:22 ` [TUHS] First appearance of named pipes Grant Taylor via TUHS
2020-03-10 7:29 ` arnold
2020-03-11 2:47 ` Grant Taylor via TUHS
2020-03-11 7:02 ` arnold
2020-03-10 13:49 ` Chet Ramey
2020-03-10 20:26 ` Dave Horsfall
2020-03-10 20:37 ` Chet Ramey [this message]
2020-03-11 2:51 ` Grant Taylor via TUHS
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-08 21:42 Paul Ruizendaal
2020-03-08 22:04 ` Jon Steinhart
2020-03-06 20:41 Paul Ruizendaal
2020-03-06 21:06 ` Clem Cole
2020-03-06 21:10 ` Clem Cole
2020-03-07 5:08 ` Heinz Lycklama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82dba3bc-a514-c5e9-eefd-615b08f58cbf@case.edu \
--to=chet.ramey@case.edu \
--cc=dave@horsfall.org \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).