[TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research

[TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research

[Paul McJones]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 876 bytes --]

> I suppose that it would make sense that all of AT&T's leading edge projects would use research Unix.  I've always heard of the original C++ to C translator but this is the first time I've actually seen it.

In case you’re interested, Bjarne Stroustrup has been helping me collect early versions of cfront here:

http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/c_plus_plus/#cfront

Previously we had located a listing of Release E (which we scanned), source for Release 1.0 of 10/10/85, and source for Release 3.0.3. From these 9th and 10th edition snapshots, cfront 1.2.2 6/10/87, AT&T C++ Translator 2.00 06/30/89, AT&T C++ Translator 2.1.0+ 04/01/90, and AT&T C++ Translator 2.1++ 08/24/90 join the list. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170405/50486227/attachment.html>

[TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research

[Jason Stevens]

wow thats perfect, thanks!

> ----------
> From: 	Paul McJones
> Sent: 	Thursday, April 6, 2017 10:42 AM
> To: 	tuhs at minnie.tuhs.org
> Cc: 	Jason Stevens
> Subject: 	Re: [TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research
> 
> 	I suppose that it would make sense that all of AT&T's leading edge
> projects would use research Unix.  I've always heard of the original C++
> to C translator but this is the first time I've actually seen it.
> 
> 
> 
> In case you're interested, Bjarne Stroustrup has been helping me collect
> early versions of cfront here:
> 
> 
> 	http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/c_plus_plus/#cfront
> 
> 
> Previously we had located a listing of Release E (which we scanned),
> source for Release 1.0 of 10/10/85, and source for Release 3.0.3. From
> these 9th and 10th edition snapshots, cfront 1.2.2 6/10/87, AT&T C++
> Translator 2.00 06/30/89, AT&T C++ Translator 2.1.0+ 04/01/90, and AT&T
> C++ Translator 2.1++ 08/24/90 join the list. 
> 

[TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research

[Jason Stevens]

I suppose that it would make sense that all of AT&T's leading edge projects would use research Unix.  I've always heard of the original C++ to C translator but this is the first time I've actually seen it.

It doesn't look like it had the wide scale following that C or Fortan had at this point.

Sadly my experience with C++ was mostly tied to Borland on the micro in early 90's, which makes it look mature compared to these early versions.

It's great finding stuff like this in the tree hiding in plain sight, if only you know what to look for. (http://unix.superglobalmegacorp.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/researchv9/cmd/cfront/?cvsroot=rv9)

Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars I always imagined NJ being more vi.  

Thanks again for making this release happen!

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170406/3aaa761a/attachment.html>

[TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research

[Noel Hunt]

> Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars
> I always imagined NJ being more vi.

I would be very much surprised if jim/sam was not the editor
of choice (apart from Ken Thompson who seemed content with
'ed').


On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Jason Stevens <
jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com> wrote:

> I suppose that it would make sense that all of AT&T's leading edge
> projects would use research Unix. I've always heard of the original C++ to
> C translator but this is the first time I've actually seen it.
>
> It doesn't look like it had the wide scale following that C or Fortan had
> at this point.
>
> Sadly my experience with C++ was mostly tied to Borland on the micro in
> early 90's, which makes it look mature compared to these early versions.
>
> It's great finding stuff like this in the tree hiding in plain sight, if
> only you know what to look for. (http://unix.superglobalmegacorp.com/cgi-
> bin/cvsweb.cgi/researchv9/cmd/cfront/?cvsroot=rv9)
>
> Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars I always imagined
> NJ being more vi.
>
> Thanks again for making this release happen!
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170406/7f41420b/attachment.html>

[TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research

[Jason Stevens]

I need to get one of those new fangled graphical terminals working!

On April 6, 2017 10:20:26 AM GMT+08:00, Noel Hunt <noel.hunt at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars
>> I always imagined NJ being more vi.
>
>
>I would be very much surprised if jim/sam was not the editor
>of choice (apart from Ken Thompson who seemed content with
>'ed').
>
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Jason Stevens <
>jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com <mailto:jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com>
>>
>wrote:
>
>
>I suppose that it would make sense that all of AT&T's leading edge
>projects would use research Unix. I've always heard of the original C++
>to C translator but this is the first time I've actually seen it.
>
>It doesn't look like it had the wide scale following that C or Fortan
>had at this point.
>
>Sadly my experience with C++ was mostly tied to Borland on the micro in
>early 90's, which makes it look mature compared to these early
>versions.
>
>It's great finding stuff like this in the tree hiding in plain sight,
>if
>only you know what to look for. ( http://unix.
><http://unix.superglobalmegacorp.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/researchv9/cmd/c
>front/?cvsroot=rv9>
>superglobalmegacorp.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/researchv9/cmd/cfront/?cvsroo
>t=rv9)
>
>Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars I always
>imagined NJ being more vi. 
>
>Thanks again for making this release happen!
>
>-- 
>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170406/50c01105/attachment-0001.html>