The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kenneth Goodwin <kennethgoodwin56@gmail.com>
To: "Erik E. Fair" <fair-tuhs@netbsd.org>
Cc: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Remember the ed thread?
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMQbRb2k3sE73Aso7ExbWX2UmgMYq8httxrjSbemteBVV7BbNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20718.1617052215@cesium.clock.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1668 bytes --]

As I recall, the Dataproducts band printers BP1000, BP2000 only had a
single hammer per column. But the band containing the full character set
moved so quickly into position for each column that the print speed was
incredible. We had both models at one point and the 2000 was an absolute
screamer.
Paper just flew over the paper guides to the collection basket in the rear.

It was impressive and incredible to watch in action.

The bands were easily replaceable via a release lever.  So you could change
fonts,  replace damaged bands, etc.
Sharp as heck as I recall on the edges.
You also had to make sure it lined up just right before engaging the
tension lever.

With cover down, they were remarkably quiet in comparison to other "high
speed" printers I had been around. Real good at multipart forms at making
clean clear impressions on the backmost layer.

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021, 5:16 PM Erik E. Fair <fair-tuhs@netbsd.org> wrote:

> Technically, the DEC DECwriter series were dot-matrix printers, not line
> printers. They differed from their Teletype predecessors only in print-head
> technology, but both printed a single character at a time. Daisywheel
> printers were similar.
>
> Line printers are distinguished not by the width of the paper but by the
> printer having enough print heads to print an entire line of output at a
> time. That speed advantage made them the preferred output device for
> many-page program listings, as opposed to a teleprinter terminals which
> were more suitable for interactive computing.
>
> There were dot-matrix line printers of the late 1970s made by Printronix,
> which is apparently still around.
>
>         Erik Fair
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2161 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-30 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29 14:34 Larry McVoy
2021-03-29 15:09 ` Anders Damsgaard
2021-03-29 15:26   ` Brantley Coile
2021-03-29 15:36     ` Mark van Atten
2021-03-29 15:43       ` Brantley Coile
2021-03-29 15:52         ` Mark van Atten
2021-03-29 15:45     ` Andy Kosela
2021-03-29 15:51       ` Clem Cole
2021-03-29 17:22       ` arnold
     [not found]         ` <CALMnNGgWrFRjXk5N4PgTj0_Yw3W5nCR2=CYSASM6dnqTooy8Dw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-30  8:53           ` arnold
2021-03-29 15:37   ` Clem Cole
2021-03-29 15:42     ` Anders Damsgaard
2021-03-29 15:49     ` Larry McVoy
2021-03-29 16:01     ` Andy Kosela
2021-03-29 18:12     ` Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via TUHS
2021-03-29 16:20 ` Steve Nickolas
2021-03-29 19:50 ` Rob Pike
2021-03-29 20:50   ` Michael Usher via TUHS
2021-03-29 20:55     ` Larry McVoy
2021-03-29 21:10       ` Erik E. Fair
2021-03-29 21:14         ` Larry McVoy
2021-03-29 21:53         ` Clem Cole
2021-03-29 22:29           ` John P. Linderman
2021-03-30  4:30             ` Rob Pike
2021-03-30  7:37             ` Harald Arnesen
2021-03-30 15:00         ` Kenneth Goodwin [this message]
2021-03-29 15:58 Norman Wilson
2021-03-30  0:11 ` John Cowan
2021-03-29 23:21 M Douglas McIlroy
2021-03-30  3:39 ` Rich Morin
     [not found] <CAKH6PiXmR6Jv0bkyOtHuk1ZLV64aeW7bnQkUnzV9-G_JaUVDAA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-30 23:38 ` John Cowan
2021-03-31  2:34   ` Bakul Shah
2021-03-31  0:54 Norman Wilson
2021-03-31  1:29 ` John Cowan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMQbRb2k3sE73Aso7ExbWX2UmgMYq8httxrjSbemteBVV7BbNw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kennethgoodwin56@gmail.com \
    --cc=fair-tuhs@netbsd.org \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).