* inetutils package conflicts? @ 2015-05-24 16:31 Stefan Mühlinghaus 2015-05-25 6:41 ` Juan RP 2015-05-25 9:02 ` Stefan Mühlinghaus 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Stefan Mühlinghaus @ 2015-05-24 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: voidlinux [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 261 bytes --] Why are there suddenly several package conflicts with inetutils-packages? Some of these packages seem very redundant. Is the inetutils meta-package supposed to completely replace several other packages, incuding but not limited to coreutils and iputils? [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 274 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: inetutils package conflicts? 2015-05-24 16:31 inetutils package conflicts? Stefan Mühlinghaus @ 2015-05-25 6:41 ` Juan RP 2015-05-25 9:02 ` Stefan Mühlinghaus 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Juan RP @ 2015-05-25 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: void..., master... [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] The inetutils pkg was splitted into smaller subpkgs and now this pkg depends on all its subpkgs, thus resulting in a conflict if you had it installed previously. You'll have to remove it and install one that does not conflict with your base. [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 276 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: inetutils package conflicts? 2015-05-24 16:31 inetutils package conflicts? Stefan Mühlinghaus 2015-05-25 6:41 ` Juan RP @ 2015-05-25 9:02 ` Stefan Mühlinghaus 2015-05-25 9:04 ` Juan RP 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Stefan Mühlinghaus @ 2015-05-25 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: voidlinux [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 342 bytes --] I understand that and I already resolved the conflicts that way. But what is the point of having a package like inetutils-hostname when that tool is already provided by coreutils? It is not really viable to remove the coreutils package. Or is it? Maybe the conflicting tools should exclusively be provided by the inetuitls-packages? [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 353 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: inetutils package conflicts? 2015-05-25 9:02 ` Stefan Mühlinghaus @ 2015-05-25 9:04 ` Juan RP 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Juan RP @ 2015-05-25 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: void..., master... [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 135 bytes --] The point is that you could create a custom `base-system` pkg and use those inetutils pkgs rather than coreutils, net-tools, etc. [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 158 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-25 9:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-05-24 16:31 inetutils package conflicts? Stefan Mühlinghaus 2015-05-25 6:41 ` Juan RP 2015-05-25 9:02 ` Stefan Mühlinghaus 2015-05-25 9:04 ` Juan RP
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).