Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chriztoffer Hansen <>
To: lejeczek <>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <>
Subject: Re: wgX iface as slave to a bridge - Linux
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:21:02 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

> Can wiregurard ifaces be enslaved by LInux bridge? I tried
> but it did not work for me. Similarly "mavclan" -
> would/should wireguard work that way?

Why would you want to enslave an L3-only capable interface to an L2 bridge?

What is your use case behind the question?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-25 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <>
2021-04-24 10:11 ` lejeczek
2021-04-25  5:33   ` Mike O'Connor
2021-04-25 12:21   ` Chriztoffer Hansen [this message]
2021-04-25 13:13     ` lejeczek
2021-04-27 19:49       ` Ivan Labáth
2021-04-25 14:07   ` Roman Mamedov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Development discussion of WireGuard

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror wireguard/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 wireguard wireguard/ \
	public-inbox-index wireguard

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone