-Wno-implicit

-Wno-implicit

[Clint Adams]

I suggest that we remove -Wno-implicit from CFLAGS.  It obscured the
fact that term.h isn't being included in terminfo.c and thus the
implicit declaration was causing a segfault on IA-64.

Re: -Wno-implicit

[Peter Stephenson]

Clint Adams wrote:
> I suggest that we remove -Wno-implicit from CFLAGS.  It obscured the
> fact that term.h isn't being included in terminfo.c and thus the
> implicit declaration was causing a segfault on IA-64.

Yes, I agree.  It's been there for years --- probably before configure ---
and since then the headers have been much better handled, so any remaining
error messages really need fixing properly.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070


**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited.  
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************