I almost hate to ask this, but: Version 5.0.9?

I almost hate to ask this, but: Version 5.0.9?

[Bart Schaefer]

I know it hasn't been that long since 5.0.8 but we've fixed a bunch of crash
bugs and deadlocks.  Heck, the "case" wordcode problem is probably bad enough
by itself to warrant a new release.

There are a few of Oliver's patches, including those during the sourceforge
outage, that haven't been pushed yet, but otherwise the most significant
thing I can recall that hasn't been addressed is the probable POSIX getopts
incompatibility.

Counter-point would be that the new typeset behavior hasn't been in the wild
for very long.

Re: I almost hate to ask this, but: Version 5.0.9?

[Mikael Magnusson]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Bart Schaefer
<schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> I know it hasn't been that long since 5.0.8 but we've fixed a bunch of crash
> bugs and deadlocks.  Heck, the "case" wordcode problem is probably bad enough
> by itself to warrant a new release.
>
> There are a few of Oliver's patches, including those during the sourceforge
> outage, that haven't been pushed yet, but otherwise the most significant
> thing I can recall that hasn't been addressed is the probable POSIX getopts
> incompatibility.
>
> Counter-point would be that the new typeset behavior hasn't been in the wild
> for very long.

I would say wait at least a few days for the $(( )) stuff? Those
patches looked a bit scary. And is the undo limit stuff sorted out? (I
haven't gotten around to actually testing git myself in a bit, just
looking over threads). Other than that, I can't think of anything.

-- 
Mikael Magnusson

Re: I almost hate to ask this, but: Version 5.0.9?

[Peter Stephenson]

On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:46:37 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> I know it hasn't been that long since 5.0.8 but we've fixed a bunch of crash
> bugs and deadlocks.  Heck, the "case" wordcode problem is probably bad enough
> by itself to warrant a new release.
> 
> There are a few of Oliver's patches, including those during the sourceforge
> outage, that haven't been pushed yet, but otherwise the most significant
> thing I can recall that hasn't been addressed is the probable POSIX getopts
> incompatibility.
> 
> Counter-point would be that the new typeset behavior hasn't been in the wild
> for very long.

Sooner rather than later, anyway.  It would be good to wait until things
settle down after the outage.

pws

Re: I almost hate to ask this, but: Version 5.0.9?

[Axel Beckert]

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 08:12:37AM +0200, Mikael Magnusson wrote:
> I would say wait at least a few days for the $(( )) stuff? Those
> patches looked a bit scary.

I can confirm that the three $((…)) patches (771381c2 + dd8079e0 +
b3aa3b77 aka 35908 + 35910) work fine for me (against 5.0.8 as well as
during a short test with git HEAD).

		Kind regards, Axel
-- 
/~\  Plain Text Ribbon Campaign                   | Axel Beckert
\ /  Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News            | abe@deuxchevaux.org  (Mail)
 X   See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | abe@noone.org (Mail+Jabber)
/ \  I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/ (Web)