zsh-workers
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Plans for 5.3?
@ 2016-11-30 22:00 Christian Heinrich
  2016-11-30 23:56 ` Bart Schaefer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christian Heinrich @ 2016-11-30 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zsh-workers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

Hi,

Peter said at the beginning of July that he wanted to release zsh 5.3
pretty soon (see #38784), but if I see that correctly, it wasn't
released yet. (I'm quite aware that there were many things to be
patched...)

Are there still some issues that continue to block a new release? I'm
asking, since Debian is going to freeze the packages at the beginning
of January and I'm still hoping that 5.3 could make it into the new
stable release, especially since a lot of patches and completions were
added.

Thanks a lot for your work!

Christian

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Plans for 5.3?
  2016-11-30 22:00 Plans for 5.3? Christian Heinrich
@ 2016-11-30 23:56 ` Bart Schaefer
  2016-12-01  2:28   ` Axel Beckert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2016-11-30 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Heinrich, zsh-workers

On Nov 30, 11:00pm, Christian Heinrich wrote:
}
} Are there still some issues that continue to block a new release? I'm
} asking, since Debian is going to freeze the packages at the beginning
} of January and I'm still hoping that 5.3 could make it into the new
} stable release, especially since a lot of patches and completions were
} added.

Peter has subsequently said that he wants 5.3 to be out before Christmas.
We've called a moritorium on further optimizations (we got a lot of those
in the last few weeks that we weren't really expecting).

So I would expect 5.3 to be out in time for January.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Plans for 5.3?
  2016-11-30 23:56 ` Bart Schaefer
@ 2016-12-01  2:28   ` Axel Beckert
  2016-12-02 12:25     ` Vincent Lefevre
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Axel Beckert @ 2016-12-01  2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zsh-workers

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:56:12PM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Nov 30, 11:00pm, Christian Heinrich wrote:
> } Are there still some issues that continue to block a new release? I'm
> } asking, since Debian is going to freeze the packages at the beginning
> } of January and I'm still hoping that 5.3 could make it into the new
> } stable release, especially since a lot of patches and completions were
> } added.

Thanks for bringing this up. Was on my TODO list, too.

> Peter has subsequently said that he wants 5.3 to be out before
> Christmas.

That's actually necessary to get 5.3 into the next Debian Stable
release.

> We've called a moritorium on further optimizations (we got a lot of those
> in the last few weeks that we weren't really expecting).
> 
> So I would expect 5.3 to be out in time for January.

Sounds as if this will become a close one. Some more details on the
timeline:

Debian's freeze for new upstream releases for the next Stable release
is on 5th of January 2017. This means that I need to upload 5.3 to
Debian Unstable latest on 24th of December to have chance to get it
transitioned from "Unstable" to "Testing" before 5th of January.

Details on the timeline at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg00002.html

This though only works if there's no so called release-critical bug
found in the package (which would prevent the transitioning), hence
the earlier, the better, so that potential bugs can be fixed in time
before Christmas.

If I can upload 5.3 only just in time on Christmas eve, the transition will
become a little bit like a lottery.

		Kind regards, Axel
-- 
/~\  Plain Text Ribbon Campaign                   | Axel Beckert
\ /  Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News            | abe@deuxchevaux.org  (Mail)
 X   See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | abe@noone.org (Mail+Jabber)
/ \  I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/ (Web)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Plans for 5.3?
  2016-12-01  2:28   ` Axel Beckert
@ 2016-12-02 12:25     ` Vincent Lefevre
  2016-12-04  2:15       ` Axel Beckert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Lefevre @ 2016-12-02 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zsh-workers

Hi,

On 2016-12-01 03:28:16 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:56:12PM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > Peter has subsequently said that he wants 5.3 to be out before
> > Christmas.
> 
> That's actually necessary to get 5.3 into the next Debian Stable
> release.

Yes, an unpatched 5.2 is too buggy (in particular, I got crashes).
On my Debian machines, I had to rebuild zsh with 5 local patches.

> > We've called a moritorium on further optimizations (we got a lot
> > of those in the last few weeks that we weren't really expecting).
> > 
> > So I would expect 5.3 to be out in time for January.
> 
> Sounds as if this will become a close one. Some more details on the
> timeline:
> 
> Debian's freeze for new upstream releases for the next Stable release
> is on 5th of January 2017. This means that I need to upload 5.3 to
> Debian Unstable latest on 24th of December to have chance to get it
> transitioned from "Unstable" to "Testing" before 5th of January.
> 
> Details on the timeline at
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg00002.html
> 
> This though only works if there's no so called release-critical bug
> found in the package (which would prevent the transitioning), hence
> the earlier, the better, so that potential bugs can be fixed in time
> before Christmas.
> 
> If I can upload 5.3 only just in time on Christmas eve, the
> transition will become a little bit like a lottery.

In the mean time, perhaps there could be a snapshot (I would have
actually hoped an alpha or beta release) in experimental, in case
bugs would be detected.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Plans for 5.3?
  2016-12-02 12:25     ` Vincent Lefevre
@ 2016-12-04  2:15       ` Axel Beckert
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Axel Beckert @ 2016-12-04  2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zsh-workers

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:25:02PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > If I can upload 5.3 only just in time on Christmas eve, the
> > transition will become a little bit like a lottery.
> 
> In the mean time, perhaps there could be a snapshot

I thought about that, too, yes.

> (I would have actually hoped an alpha or beta release) in
> experimental, in case bugs would be detected.

Pws released 5.2-test-1 only recently, so there was none until
recently. But I'll upload that to Debian Experimental for testing soon
(either tonight or tomorrow).

		Kind regards, Axel
-- 
/~\  Plain Text Ribbon Campaign                   | Axel Beckert
\ /  Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News            | abe@deuxchevaux.org  (Mail)
 X   See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | abe@noone.org (Mail+Jabber)
/ \  I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/ (Web)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-04  2:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-30 22:00 Plans for 5.3? Christian Heinrich
2016-11-30 23:56 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-12-01  2:28   ` Axel Beckert
2016-12-02 12:25     ` Vincent Lefevre
2016-12-04  2:15       ` Axel Beckert

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).