* [PATCH 2/3] Tests for named references
@ 2023-02-06 2:24 Bart Schaefer
2023-02-07 0:33 ` Daniel Shahaf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2023-02-06 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zsh hackers list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]
Forgot to mention in patch #1 email that I decided not to create a
"nameref" built-in yet.
Here are the test cases, I covered everything I could think of. If
you see something I missed, let me know.
[-- Attachment #2: nameref-2-tests.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11520 bytes --]
diff --git a/Test/K01nameref.ztst b/Test/K01nameref.ztst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b38831100
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Test/K01nameref.ztst
@@ -0,0 +1,439 @@
+# Tests for the zsh/param/private module
+
+%prep
+
+ # Required in order to declare an unset hash for substitution test
+ setopt TYPESET_TO_UNSET
+
+ : ${ZTST_continue:=1}
+
+%test
+
+ typeset -n ptr
+ typeset -n
+0:minimal declaration
+>ptr
+
+ typeset -n ptr=
+ typeset -n
+0:nameref placeholder
+>ptr=''
+
+ typeset -n ptr
+ ptr=var
+ typeset -n
+0:assign nameref placeholder
+>ptr=var
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ typeset +n ptr
+ typeset -p ptr
+0:remove nameref attribute
+>typeset ptr=var
+
+ typeset -n ptr
+ typeset -t ptr
+ typeset -p ptr
+0:change type of a placeholder
+F:Other type changes are fatal errors, should this also be?
+>typeset -n ptr=''
+*?*ptr: can't change type of a named reference
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ typeset -t ptr
+ typeset -p ptr var
+0:change type of referenced var
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+>typeset -t var
+
+ typeset -n ptr[1]=var
+1:illegal nameref name
+*?*reference variable cannot be an array
+
+ typeset var=value
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ print $ptr
+0:basic nameref expansion
+>value
+
+ typeset var=(val1 val2)
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ print $ptr
+0:nameref array expansion
+>val1 val2
+
+ typeset -A var=(val1 val2)
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ print ${(kv)ptr}
+0:nameref hash expansion
+>val1 val2
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ typeset var=value
+ typeset -p ptr var
+ ptr=newvalue
+ typeset -p ptr var
+0:assign existing scalar via nameref
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+>typeset var=value
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+>typeset var=newvalue
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ typeset var=value
+ unset ptr
+ typeset -p var
+0:unset via nameref
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ typeset var=value
+ typeset -p ptr var
+ typeset ptr=newvalue
+ typeset -p ptr var
+0:typeset existing scalar via nameref
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+>typeset var=value
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+>typeset var=newvalue
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ ptr=value
+ typeset -p var ptr
+ unset var # for next test
+0:assign new scalar via nameref
+>typeset -g var=value
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ typeset var=(val1 val2)
+ typeset -p ptr var
+ ptr=(new1 new2)
+ typeset -p ptr var
+0:assign existing array via nameref
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+>typeset -a var=( val1 val2 )
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+>typeset -a var=( new1 new2 )
+
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+1:check state of paramtab ONE
+F:unexpected side-effects of previous tests
+*?*no such variable: ptr1
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+*?*no such variable: var
+
+ typeset -n ptr=var
+ ptr=(val1 val2)
+ typeset -p var ptr
+ unset var # for next test
+0:assign new array via nameref
+>typeset -g -a var=( val1 val2 )
+>typeset -n ptr=var
+
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset var=value
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+ print $ptr1
+0:indirect nameref expansion
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset var=value
+>value
+
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+1:check state of paramtab TWO
+F:unexpected side-effects of previous tests
+*?*no such variable: ptr1
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+*?*no such variable: var
+
+ typeset var
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset ptr1=newvalue
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+0:typeset existing parameter indirectly
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset var=newvalue
+
+ typeset var=value
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ unset ptr1
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+0:unset parameter indirectly
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset ptr1=newvalue
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+ unset var # for next test
+0:typeset new parameter indirectly
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset var=newvalue
+
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset var=value
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+ ptr1=newvalue
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+0:assign new parameter indirectly
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset var=value
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset var=newvalue
+
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+1:check state of paramtab THREE
+F:unexpected side-effects of previous tests
+*?*no such variable: ptr1
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+*?*no such variable: var
+
+ typeset -a var
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset ptr1=(val1 val2)
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+0:typeset existing array indirectly
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset -a var=( val1 val2 )
+
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset ptr1=(val1 val2)
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+ unset var # for next test
+0:typeset new array indirectly
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset -a var=( val1 val2 )
+
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+1:check state of paramtab FOUR
+F:unexpected side-effects of previous tests
+*?*no such variable: ptr1
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+*?*no such variable: var
+
+ typeset -n ptr2=var
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ ptr1=(val1 val2)
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2 var
+0:assign new array indirectly
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=var
+>typeset -g -a var=( val1 val2 )
+
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset -n ptr2=ptr1
+1:direct nameref loop not allowed
+*?*invalid self reference
+
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset -n ptr2=ptr3
+ typeset -n ptr3=ptr1
+1:indirect nameref loop not allowed
+*?*invalid self reference
+
+ typeset -n ptr2='path[2]'
+ print -r -- $ptr2
+0d:nameref to array element
+>${path[2]}
+
+ typeset -A hash=(x MISS y HIT)
+ typeset -n ptr1='hash[y]'
+ print -r -- $ptr1
+0:nameref to hash element
+>HIT
+
+ typeset -a ary=(1 2)
+ typeset -n ptr2='ary[2]'
+ ptr2=TWO
+ typeset -p ary
+0:assign array element by nameref
+>typeset -a ary=( 1 TWO )
+
+ typeset -n ptr2='ary[2]'
+ ptr2=TWO
+ typeset -p ary
+0f:create array element by nameref
+F:ksh93 does not implement this either
+>typeset -a ary=( '' TWO )
+
+ typeset -A hash=(x MISS y MISS)
+ typeset -n ptr1='hash[y]'
+ ptr1=HIT
+ typeset -p hash
+0:assign to hash element by nameref
+>typeset -A hash=( [x]=MISS [y]=HIT )
+
+ typeset -A hash
+ typeset -n ptr1='hash[y]'
+ ptr1=HIT
+ typeset -p hash
+0f:create hash by element nameref
+F:ksh93 does not implement this either
+>typeset -A hash=( [y]=HIT )
+
+ typeset -n ptr1='not good'
+1:invalid nameref
+*?*invalid variable name: not good
+
+ typeset -A hash
+ typeset -n ptr1='hash[y]'
+ print ${ptr1::=HIT}
+ typeset -p ptr1 hash
+0f:create hash by element substitution
+>HIT
+>typeset -n ptr1='hash[y]'
+>typeset -A hash=( [y]=HIT )
+
+ typeset -n ptr=gval
+ gval=global
+ () { local gval=local; print $ptr; typeset -p ptr gval }
+ unset gval # for next test
+0:up-reference part 1
+>global
+>typeset -g -n ptr=gval
+>typeset gval=local
+
+ typeset -p ptr ptr1 ptr2 val gval
+1:check state of paramtab FIVE
+F:unexpected side-effects of previous tests
+*?*no such variable: ptr
+*?*no such variable: ptr1
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+*?*no such variable: val
+*?*no such variable: gval
+
+ typeset -n ptr1=gval
+ typeset gval
+ () { typeset gval=local; ptr1=global }
+ typeset -p ptr1 gval
+0:up-reference assignment part 1
+F:All tests run inside a function, so "typeset gval" creates a local;
+F:if that were omitted, ptr1= assignment would create a true global
+F:and the output below would change to "typeset -g gval=global"
+>typeset -n ptr1=gval
+>typeset gval=global
+
+ typeset -p ptr ptr1 ptr2 val gval
+1:check state of paramtab SIX
+F:unexpected side-effects of previous tests
+*?*no such variable: ptr
+*?*no such variable: ptr1
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+*?*no such variable: val
+*?*no such variable: gval
+
+ typeset gval=global
+ () {
+ typeset -n ptr=gval
+ local gval=local
+ print $ptr
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr gval
+1:up-reference part 2
+>global
+*?*no such variable: ptr
+>typeset gval=global
+
+ typeset -n ptr=gval
+ () {
+ local lval=local
+ typeset -n ptr=lval
+ ptr=LOCAL
+ typeset -p lval gval ptr
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr
+0:localized namerefs hide global namerefs
+*?*no such variable: gval
+>typeset lval=LOCAL
+>typeset -n ptr=lval
+>typeset -n ptr=gval
+
+ () {
+ zmodload -u zsh/parameter
+ typeset -n myself=parameters[myself]
+ local -h parameters
+ print -r -- $myself
+ typeset -p parameters
+ }
+0:up-reference part 3, autoloading with hidden special
+>nameref-local
+>typeset parameters
+
+ () {
+ typeset notdef
+ unset notdef
+ () {
+ typeset -n ptr=notdef
+ ptr=(DEFINED)
+ }
+ typeset -p notdef
+ }
+0:up-reference part 4, unset local and type change
+>typeset -a notdef=( DEFINED )
+
+ () {
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset -n ptr2
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ typeset val=LOCAL
+ () {
+ ptr1=val
+ typeset -n
+ printf "%s=%s\n" ptr1 "$ptr1" ptr2 "$ptr2"
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr2
+1:up-reference part 5, stacked namerefs, end not in scope
+F:What is the correct behavior for the scope of ptr1?
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=''
+>ptr1=ptr2
+>ptr2=val
+>ptr1=LOCAL
+>ptr2=LOCAL
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=val
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+
+ typeset ptr2
+ () {
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset -n ptr2
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ typeset val=LOCAL
+ () {
+ ptr1=val
+ typeset -n
+ printf "%s=%s\n" ptr1 "$ptr1" ptr2 "$ptr2"
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr2
+0:up-reference part 6, stacked namerefs, end is in scope
+F:Same test, should part 5 output look like this?
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=''
+>ptr1=ptr2
+>ptr2=''
+>ptr1=val
+>ptr2=
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset -n ptr2=''
+>typeset ptr2=val
+
+%clean
diff --git a/Test/V10private.ztst b/Test/V10private.ztst
index 56ffbc5b4..b191afcb7 100644
--- a/Test/V10private.ztst
+++ b/Test/V10private.ztst
@@ -299,6 +299,84 @@ F:future revision will create a global with this assignment
*>*
*>*
+ typeset top=TOP
+ () {
+ local -P -n test=top
+ print $top
+ () { print UP: $test }
+ }
+0:nameref can be declared private
+>TOP
+>UP:
+
+ () {
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ private -n ptr2
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ typeset val=LOCAL
+ () {
+ ptr1=val
+ typeset -n
+ printf "%s=%s\n" ptr1 "$ptr1" ptr2 "$ptr2"
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr2
+1:up-reference for private namerefs, end not in scope
+F:See K01typeset.ztst up-reference part 5
+F:Here ptr1 finds private ptr2 by scope mismatch, assignment silently fails
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>ptr1=ptr2
+>ptr1=
+>ptr2=
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+
+ typeset ptr2
+ () {
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ private -n ptr2
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ typeset val=LOCAL
+ () {
+ ptr1=val;
+ typeset -n
+ printf "%s=%s\n" ptr1 "$ptr1" ptr2 "$ptr2"
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr2
+0:up-reference for private namerefs, end is in scope
+F:See K01typeset.ztst up-reference part 5
+F:Here ptr1 points to global ptr2 so assignment succeeds
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>ptr1=ptr2
+>ptr2=val
+>ptr1=val
+>ptr2=val
+>typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+>typeset ptr2=val
+
+ () {
+ setopt localoptions errreturn
+ private -n ptr2
+ typeset -n ptr1=ptr2
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ typeset val=LOCAL
+ () {
+ ptr1=val
+ typeset -n
+ printf "v %s=%s\n" ptr1 "$ptr1" ptr2 "$ptr2"
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+ }
+ typeset -p ptr1 ptr2
+1:up-reference for private namerefs, end is in scope but private
+F:Should we allow "public" namerefs to private parameters?
+*?*ptr2: invalid reference
+*?*no such variable: ptr1
+*?*no such variable: ptr2
+
%clean
rm -r private.TMP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] Tests for named references
2023-02-06 2:24 [PATCH 2/3] Tests for named references Bart Schaefer
@ 2023-02-07 0:33 ` Daniel Shahaf
2023-02-07 3:24 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2023-02-07 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zsh hackers list
Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 18:24:58 -0800:
> Forgot to mention in patch #1 email that I decided not to create a
> "nameref" built-in yet.
>
> Here are the test cases, I covered everything I could think of. If
> you see something I missed, let me know.
> diff --git a/Test/K01nameref.ztst b/Test/K01nameref.ztst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..b38831100
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Test/K01nameref.ztst
Add "K:" to Test/README?
> @@ -0,0 +1,439 @@
> +# Tests for the zsh/param/private module
Copy-pasto.
> +%prep
> +
> + # Required in order to declare an unset hash for substitution test
> + setopt TYPESET_TO_UNSET
> +
> + : ${ZTST_continue:=1}
> +
> +%test
> +
> + typeset -n ptr=var
> + typeset var=value
> + unset ptr
> + typeset -p var
> +0:unset via nameref
> +
So this expects «typeset -p var» to return 0 and have no output. Are
these the correct expectations?
> + typeset -n ptr2='path[2]'
> + print -r -- $ptr2
> +0d:nameref to array element
> +>${path[2]}
> +
Did you mean "0q" rather than "0d"?
I guess we should make the test harness warn (at least) when the "d"
flag is present and expected stdout is not empty.
⋮
> +%clean
How about tests for assigning to a nameref-to-hash? (Entire hash, not
hash element) Or are these implied by the "assign to array" and "expand
nameref-to-hash" tests.
Also, in 1/3 you wrote "attempting to add an attribute to a named
reference generates a warning", but I don't see a single test expecting
a non-empty stderr?
>
Haven't reviewed the V10private.ztst tests or the other two patches in
this series.
Cheers,
Daniel
P.S. I wonder if it'd be useful to write a scriptlet that takes
a one-liner in argv and emits on stdout a test that runs the one-liner and
expects its current exitcode/stdout/stderr. The idea is to use it
along the lines of «Test/generate 'pwd' >> Test/B42pwd.ztst».
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] Tests for named references
2023-02-07 0:33 ` Daniel Shahaf
@ 2023-02-07 3:24 ` Bart Schaefer
2023-02-07 9:28 ` Daniel Shahaf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2023-02-07 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zsh hackers list
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:36 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 18:24:58 -0800:
]> > +++ b/Test/K01nameref.ztst
>
> Add "K:" to Test/README?
Forgot that file even existed. Added.
> > +# Tests for the zsh/param/private module
>
> Copy-pasto.
Fixed.
> > + typeset -n ptr=var
> > + typeset var=value
> > + unset ptr
> > + typeset -p var
> > +0:unset via nameref
> > +
>
> So this expects «typeset -p var» to return 0 and have no output. Are
> these the correct expectations?
Matches ksh93 to the best of my ability to test.
>
> > + typeset -n ptr2='path[2]'
> > + print -r -- $ptr2
> > +0d:nameref to array element
> > +>${path[2]}
> > +
>
> Did you mean "0q" rather than "0d"?
Indeed I did. Changed.
> How about tests for assigning to a nameref-to-hash? (Entire hash, not
> hash element) Or are these implied by the "assign to array" and "expand
> nameref-to-hash" tests.
I believe they are so implied.
> Also, in 1/3 you wrote "attempting to add an attribute to a named
> reference generates a warning", but I don't see a single test expecting
> a non-empty stderr?
Not sure what you mean here, there are lots of tests that expect a
zero exit status and check output only on stdout. The fifth test
specifically attempts adding the "tag" attribute to a named reference
and looks for the expected warning. In a number of cases I'm checking
that the state of variables has been restored to the expected state by
looking for both correct stdout of the earlier steps and "no such
variable" after the test is done, the intent being to catch any cases
where the nameref goes too far up the stack of scopes.
Consolidated patch for both proofreadings will follow if when there's
no futher discussion.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] Tests for named references
2023-02-07 3:24 ` Bart Schaefer
@ 2023-02-07 9:28 ` Daniel Shahaf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2023-02-07 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zsh hackers list
Bart Schaefer wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 19:24:52 -0800:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:36 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Also, in 1/3 you wrote "attempting to add an attribute to a named
> > reference generates a warning", but I don't see a single test expecting
> > a non-empty stderr?
>
> Not sure what you mean here, there are lots of tests that expect a
> zero exit status and check output only on stdout. The fifth test
> specifically attempts adding the "tag" attribute to a named reference
> and looks for the expected warning.
Sorry, my bad. I grepped for lines that start with '?' forgot about the
possibility to prepend a '*' to that. The fifth test is indeed what I
was looking for (and didn't find).
> In a number of cases I'm checking
> that the state of variables has been restored to the expected state by
> looking for both correct stdout of the earlier steps and "no such
> variable" after the test is done, the intent being to catch any cases
> where the nameref goes too far up the stack of scopes.
👍
Cheers,
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-07 9:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-06 2:24 [PATCH 2/3] Tests for named references Bart Schaefer
2023-02-07 0:33 ` Daniel Shahaf
2023-02-07 3:24 ` Bart Schaefer
2023-02-07 9:28 ` Daniel Shahaf
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).