Not a -M option

Not a -M option

[Zefram]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

This patch fixes the following problem:

~/usr% set --
~/usr% setopt autocd
~/usr% $@
~%

(The "$@" command should get a "no command" error.)

 -zefram

      *** 1.1	1995/12/23 17:39:23
      --- exec.c	1996/01/10 08:03:17
      ***************
      *** 1292,1298 ****
        	/* If no command found yet, see if it is *
        	 * a directory we should AUTOCD to.      */
        	if (!hn && isset(AUTOCD) && isset(SHINSTDIN) && empty(cmd->redir)
      ! 	    && !nextnode(firstnode(args)) && (s = cancd(peekfirst(args)))) {
        	    peekfirst(args) = (void *) s;
        	    pushnode(args, dupstring("cd"));
        	    if ((hn = builtintab->getnode(builtintab, "cd")))
      --- 1292,1299 ----
        	/* If no command found yet, see if it is *
        	 * a directory we should AUTOCD to.      */
        	if (!hn && isset(AUTOCD) && isset(SHINSTDIN) && empty(cmd->redir)
      ! 	    && !nextnode(firstnode(args))
      ! 	    && (s = cancd(peekfirst(args))) && *s) {
        	    peekfirst(args) = (void *) s;
        	    pushnode(args, dupstring("cd"));
        	    if ((hn = builtintab->getnode(builtintab, "cd")))

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQCVAgUBMPNzp3D/+HJTpU/hAQHFzQP+JFZFa/R1GVnq347WNzm2Rs2/4DoAZkU+
Wg8t0+diyUpVIACeLs+Flwo59NSGq4quVLcI0gWeJubgYaw5VnBczqq1+zxLfKhO
YKuQMIUpdX+aOUkOEC3hV/6bmD0uozBdlexNvvDVqQc2i/6ebLWnKIn8+QvQPWki
Uy/6ykAj5Fg=
=Wg88
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Not a -M option

[P.Stephenson]

A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> This patch fixes the following problem:
> 
> ~/usr% set --
> ~/usr% setopt autocd
> ~/usr% $@
> ~%
> 
> (The "$@" command should get a "no command" error.)

I'm pretty sure I sent a patch for this some time ago, something very
similar anyway.

If we're really expecting to produce a release in March, there are a
number of other purely bug-fix patches of mine I'd like to see rescued
from the black hole, otherwise the corresponding bugs are probably
never going to get fixed.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@ifh.de>       Tel: +49 33762 77366
WWW:  http://www.ifh.de/~pws/       Fax: +49 33762 77330
Deutches Electronen-Synchrotron --- Institut fuer Hochenergiephysik Zeuthen
DESY-IfH, 15735 Zeuthen, Germany.

Re: Not a -M option

[Zefram]

Peter wrote:
>I'm pretty sure I sent a patch for this some time ago, something very
>similar anyway.

I'm not sure exactly what your patch did, but it didn't fix the bug I
had reported (at least, not the way I was experiencing it).

>If we're really expecting to produce a release in March, there are a
>number of other purely bug-fix patches of mine I'd like to see rescued
>from the black hole, otherwise the corresponding bugs are probably
>never going to get fixed.

I find myself thinking along similar lines.  I've sent several bug
fixes that haven't got into the baseline yet.  And Zoltan's releases
have an enormous number.  I think the bugfix patches in Zoltan's
release, particularly in the lexer, need to be integrated as a matter
of urgency.

-zefram

Re: Not a -M option

[Mark Borges]

As a general rule, I hate "me too" messages, but...

>> On Wed, 10 Jan 1996 09:21:21 +0000 (GMT),
>> Zefram (Z) wrote:
Z> Peter wrote:

>> If we're really expecting to produce a release in March, there are a
>> number of other purely bug-fix patches of mine I'd like to see rescued
>> from the black hole, otherwise the corresponding bugs are probably
>> never going to get fixed.
 
Z> And Zoltan's releases have an enormous number.  I think the bugfix
Z> patches in Zoltan's release, particularly in the lexer, need to be <<<<<
Z> integrated as a matter of urgency.

I too think Zoltan's lexer changes need to be integrated in the
baseline as a high priority.

  -mb-