zsh-workers
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
Cc: Marlon Richert <marlon.richert@gmail.com>,
	Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add xfail tests for || form of completion matchers
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:08:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7YTn=aQU6qPa7ih7dObfKo1tbFfDirRoEzdmc3vY58eNg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012152532.GC17948@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:26 AM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> Marlon Richert wrote on Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 15:08:46 +0300:
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 5:34 PM Marlon Richert <marlon.richert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The tests show how :||= matchers should behave in order to provide
> > > completion features that cannot be implemented with :|= matchers.
>
> Would this be backwards compatible?

In particular, with the exception of specific bug regression tests,
all the tests using || matchers have been converted to xfails.
Shouldn't there still be some generic tests of the (functionally
correct subset of) the current behavior of || ?  And, do you think any
of the regression tests would begin to fail if the xfail tests begin
to succeed?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-11 14:34 Marlon Richert
2021-10-12 12:08 ` Marlon Richert
2021-10-12 15:25   ` Daniel Shahaf
2021-10-13  4:57     ` Bart Schaefer
2021-10-13  5:08     ` Bart Schaefer [this message]
2021-10-13 14:20       ` Marlon Richert
2021-10-13 19:37         ` Daniel Shahaf
2021-10-13 20:02           ` Bart Schaefer
2021-10-14 20:25           ` Oliver Kiddle
2021-10-14 20:43   ` Oliver Kiddle
2021-10-14 21:16     ` Bart Schaefer
2021-10-22 13:02   ` Oliver Kiddle
2021-10-25 18:41     ` Marlon Richert
2021-10-25 19:41       ` Bart Schaefer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAH+w=7YTn=aQU6qPa7ih7dObfKo1tbFfDirRoEzdmc3vY58eNg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=schaefer@brasslantern.com \
    --cc=d.s@daniel.shahaf.name \
    --cc=marlon.richert@gmail.com \
    --cc=zsh-workers@zsh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).