From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] sendfd() on native Plan 9?
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:24:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1231118687.11463.317.camel@goose.sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f971a06f85a460fe83f7571989845ba@proxima.alt.za>
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 20:23 +0200, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> > i haven't even seen what i think is a compelling
> > argument for sendfd yet you're trying to argue
> > for second-order problems with a particular
> > application of sendfd.
> >
> Sendfd() seems to me a somewhat more carefully controlled version of
> /srv. As it stands, the additional features of sendfd() involving
> security are not present in /srv,
Guys, lets stop talking about security issues. I don't think there are
any that need to be worried about. Nathaniel has identified a couple
of real issues with the current implementation of /srv so lets focus
on those.
> so one can make a case for providing sendfd()
> or a moral equivalent
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ incoming... ;-) (Sorry, couldn't resit)
Thanks,
Roman.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-23 18:01 Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-12-23 22:52 ` Rodolfo kix Garcia
2008-12-23 23:53 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2008-12-24 1:10 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-12-24 1:39 ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-24 3:00 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-12-24 4:14 ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-24 7:36 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-12-24 13:36 ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-27 20:27 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-12-27 20:34 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-12-27 20:21 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-12-30 8:22 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-12-30 15:04 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-12-30 15:31 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-01 22:53 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-01 23:57 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-01-03 21:23 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-03 21:41 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-03 21:59 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-03 23:57 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-01-04 5:19 ` lucio
2009-01-04 5:48 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-04 6:10 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-01-04 6:43 ` lucio
2009-01-05 1:12 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-05 1:32 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-05 3:48 ` lucio
2009-01-04 17:32 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-04 18:23 ` lucio
2009-01-05 1:24 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik [this message]
2009-01-04 5:58 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-01-04 6:26 ` lucio
2009-01-04 15:46 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-05 4:30 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-12-24 1:17 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-12-27 17:06 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1231118687.11463.317.camel@goose.sun.com \
--to=rvs@sun.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
--cc=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).